ShareThis Page

British study: Even moderate drinking can damage the brain

| Tuesday, June 6, 2017, 11:33 p.m.
A waitress carries beer mugs during the opening of the Oktoberfest beer festival in a festival tent at the Theresienwiese in Munich, southern German.
AFP/Getty Images
A waitress carries beer mugs during the opening of the Oktoberfest beer festival in a festival tent at the Theresienwiese in Munich, southern German.

Here's one more reason to think before you drink: even a modest amount of booze might be bad for aging brains.

A new study published Tuesday in the medical journal BMJ says moderate drinkers were more likely than abstainers or light drinkers to develop worrisome brain changes that might signal eventual memory loss. They also were more likely to show rapid slippage on a language test, though not on several other cognitive tests.

Moderate drinking in the British study was defined at a level that, in the United States, would equal 8 to 12 small glasses of wine, bottles of beer or shots of liquor each week.

“Many people drink this way,” and previous studies have suggested they might actually be helping their brains, said lead researcher Anya Topiwala, a clinical lecturer in psychiatry at the University of Oxford.

The new study casts doubt on that idea, suggesting harm from moderate drinking and no help from light drinking, she said. The study did not look at heavy, abusive drinking, but that already is firmly linked with brain damage and dementia, she noted.

For the study, she and her colleagues examined three decades of records from 527 British civil servants who are part of a long-running health study. The volunteers, who are predominantly white middle class men, took brief cognitive tests and recorded their drinking histories on multiple occasions, starting at an average age of 43.

The researchers brought the volunteers in for brain scans, repeated the brief cognitive tests and administered a more extensive battery of memory and thinking tests.

For the most part, light to moderate drinkers and abstainers performed similarly when they were matched for age, sex, education, social class, physical activity, smoking and other factors.

There was one exception: moderate to heavy drinkers showed more rapid declines on a language fluency test. The test gives people a minute to name as many words as they can, beginning with a particular letter.

The brain scans also showed differences. Most notably, the heaviest drinkers were most likely to have clear shrinkage of a part of the brain called the hippocampus, a change that can precede or accompany dementia. Even moderate drinkers were three times more likely than abstainers to show hippocampal shrinkage, the researchers said.

An important caveat: The study is observational, so it cannot prove cause and effect. It is possible that frequent drinkers had other things in common that accounted for the brain and language changes.

Still, at this point, “I wouldn't recommend light to moderate drinking as a strategy to avoid cognitive decline,” Topiwala said. And, she said, it's not clear how much drinking might be safe from a brain health standpoint.

U.S. guidelines recommend no more than 1 drink a day for women and 2 drinks a day for men, citing uncertain heart benefits and known risks, including traffic accidents, violence, and a link with breast cancer. Many countries, including the United Kingdom, recommend lower limits for men.

There is no health reason for anyone who does not drink to take up drinking, said Brian Downer, an assistant professor in the division of rehabilitation sciences at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. The new research is a good reminder that even moderate drinking can have health consequences, said Downer, who was not involved in the study.

But, he said, more research on cognitive effects is needed. And none of the findings suggests a need for total abstinence, he said. “You don't have to feel that you have to completely quit drinking to have a healthy lifestyle.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me