ShareThis Page

Tourist may have exposed New Yorkers to measles

Ben Schmitt
| Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2018, 9:49 a.m.

The Big Apple has a measles scare in effect.

The New York State Department of Health warned people in New York City about an Australian tourist confirmed to have measles who visited hotels and the Metropolitan Museum of Art from Feb. 16 to 21, according to the Washington Post .

Mumps and measles — both highly infectious viruses — are rare today because of the MMR vaccine, which is administered to children. But experts say there are suggestions the immunizations may lose strength as people age.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 92 percent of U.S. children had received the recommended two doses of the vaccine before age 3.

Earlier this month, Allegheny County reported a measles case in a Carnegie Mellon University student , and officials at Penn State's University Park campus reported four confirmed cases of mumps among students there.

The New York locations where people could have been exposed to measles are:

• La Quinta Inn, 31 W. 71st Street, New York City.

• Oasis Bible Tours at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1000 5th Avenue, New York City.

• Watchtower Educational Center, 100 Watchtower Drive, Patterson, N.Y.

• Best Western Hotel, 1324 Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn, N.Y.

• Comfort Inn & Suites Goshen — Middletown, 20 Hatfield Lane, Goshen, N.Y.

• Excel Urgent Care, 1 Hatfield Lane, Goshen, N.Y.

Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991, or via Twitter at @Bencschmitt.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me