ShareThis Page

Delmont gathering public input to update borough's zoning ordinance

Patrick Varine
| Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2016, 12:18 p.m.

Delmont planning commission member Tim Schmida's goal for updating the borough's zoning ordinance is simple.

“It's time to get caught up,” he said.

The borough's ordinance, which Schmida said was updated in the early 1990s, needs to be brought into line with the state's Municipalities Planning Code, which was updated in 2005.

“Initially the planning commission was going to do the update. When I came on board in 2015, we found that we just didn't have the skill-set to do that,” Schmida said.

To that end, council opted to hire Michael Baker International of Pittsburgh as a consultant to update, as well as create a digital version of the ordinance and a zoning map that can be uploaded to the borough's website for developers and residents to peruse.

Jennifer Cristobal, a planner with Michael Baker International, will be at the Delmont Daze festival on Saturday to get some feedback from residents that will help inform her work with the planning commission.

“That's a really key part of (updating) the ordinance, because it really describes the intent of the work we'll be doing,” Cristobal said. “I think it's really important to get some input from the public.”

Typically, community development objectives are gone over in workshops and mapped out in a town's comprehensive plan. Cristobal said Delmont's comprehensive plan dates to the 1970s.

“So this is a way to see what people's vision is for the community,” she said.

At Delmont council's August meeting, resident and former Councilwoman Julie Walczer said she did not understand the need for the update or the consulting firm, given the small amount of developable land in the borough.

Cristobal said land use in any town is constantly shifting.

“You have to think about the fact that just because it's fully built out, that doesn't mean things won't change,” Cristobal said. “If one of the businesses on the Route 66 corridor was to close, do you want an apartment building there? You also have to think about nonconforming uses: Are there things in places where you don't want them to be?”

A number of residents, Walczer included, objected to the proposal for a Speedway gas station on the southbound side of Route 66. That project was ultimately approved after meeting the requirements of the zoning code.

Another topic for debate, Schmida said, was the number of “historical treasures” in the borough.

“There's the old hotel at the corner of Pittsburgh and Greensburg streets, the old Mook's Hardware store where (Salem Antiquities) is now,” he said. “There's an old log cabin as you head up Pittsburgh Street toward the cemetery … do we want to look at establishing some sort of historical district? Maybe, maybe not, but it's something we need to discuss.”

After taking input from residents at Delmont Daze, Cristobal said, the next step is releasing a document in October or November outlining proposed changes to the ordinance and soliciting more input from the community.

In the fall, the planning commission's meetings — the first Tuesday of each month, 7 p.m. at the borough building on Greensburg Street — will take the form of workshop sessions with Cristobal and the public.

Schmida said he would like to see residents have a large hand in the zoning updates.

“We have to look at our options in terms of preserving what we have, and planning for the future,” he said.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2862 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me