ShareThis Page

Field house or expanded gym future possibilities for Pine-Richland athletics

| Monday, Aug. 8, 2016, 7:57 p.m.
Rendering shows what a converted Pine-Richland High School gym would look like, with 1,500 seats.
Rendering shows what a converted Pine-Richland High School gym would look like, with 1,500 seats.

A $14 million field house for multiple sports — partly paid for by sponsors — tops a new list of proposed projects to improve athletic facilities in the Pine-Richland School District.

Or the district could spend $2.8 million to renovate and add 500 seats to the high school's main gym, then convert the school's second gym, known as the Green Gym, into a fitness center.

Other proposed improvements include private showers in sports teams' locker rooms, and a community walking track around an expanded Santacroce athletic field at Richland Elementary School.

All are among long-range, possible capital improvement projects suggested by VEBH Architects of Mt. Lebanon to help accommodate the school district's increased number of athletic teams and students' participation in sports.

The school board hired VEBH Architects in January to conduct a study of the district's athletic facilities and future needs by gathering input from administrators, trainers, coaches and people at public meetings held in April and June.

Architect Daniel Engen of VEBH Architects presented the resulting 43-page Pine-Richland Athletic Facilities Master Plan at a meeting of the Pine Richland School Board's finance and building and grounds committees on Aug. 4 at the high school.

“It represents one set of options,” Engen said about the plan. “It is designed to be a foundation for what comes next.”

The master plan suggests projects for completion within the next 10 years on the campuses of Richland Elementary, Pine-Richland Middle and Pine Richland High schools, plus, renovations within the high school and the high school's stadium.

“It should be noted that many potential options exist and no specific recommendation is being made at this time,” according to the meeting's printed agenda. “The presentation serves as a foundation for future discussion and long-range planning.”

Another joint meeting of the school board's finance and building and grounds committees tentatively is set for 6 p.m. Aug. 22 at the high school for a discussion of how the suggested capital improvements might be funded.

“The reality is that this is a big puzzle,” said Brian Miller, superintendent of Pine-Richland School District. “This allows us to have better funding discussions,” Miller said about the master plan.

Miller attended the Aug. 4 meeting with Michael Pasquinelli, assistant superintendent.

Pasquinelli said the school district would not consider building the proposed field house with just tax dollars. “This is definitely something we would want to partner with an outside organization,” he said.

VEBH Architects' master plan proposes to put the two-story field house on the north side of the parking lot that is on the east side of Pine-Richland Middle School.

“If there is not an appetite for a private partnership, we don't see that as a viable option,” Miller said about the proposed field house.

“We have a couple years to determine the viability of that project.”

Since 1993, the number of athletic teams available for seventh- through 12th-graders in the Pine-Richland School District has grown from 25 to 48, according to VEBH Architects' study.

Deborah Deasy is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-772-6369 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me