ShareThis Page

Westmoreland Heritage Trail supporters hope for cooperation from Norfolk Southern

| Wednesday, April 27, 2016, 7:45 p.m.

Supporters of the Westmoreland Heritage Trail hope that Westmoreland County can work with Norfolk Southern Railroad to use a piece of its land for a proposed trail.

Rey Peduzzi, Trafford's former mayor who has been active in developing the trail, asked Trafford officials last week to voice their support for the county working with the railroad. He said the trail will help attract people to area when it's complete.

“When this trail comes in, it's going to be a big trailhead for this area,” Peduzzi said. “When the trail is developed it's one of the pristine trails in the area.”

Currently, plans for the trail have it coming through BY Park in Trafford. Organizers want to extend that down to the Veterans Memorial Bridge near the intersection of Fifth Street and Brinton Avenue. To do that, they would need cooperation from Norfolk Southern to use about 3,800 feet of its property for the trail.

Jeffrey Richards, parks planning coordinator for Westmoreland County Parks and Recreation, said the railroad company currently uses the land as a staging area for railroad cars. Working with the railroad company can take time, but county officials are willing to do the work for the trail.

“The county is quite happy to pursue Norfolk Southern,” Richards said.

Borough manager Rich Sahar will draft a letter of support for Westmoreland County officials working with Norfolk Southern to benefit the trail. Council will vote on it at its next meeting May 3.

Tom McGee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2867 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me