AG Josh Shapiro vows to appeal ruling that spared Graham Spanier from jail |

AG Josh Shapiro vows to appeal ruling that spared Graham Spanier from jail

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro speaks during a news conference at the state Capitol in Harrisburg, Pa., Wednesday, April 10, 2019. Democratic lawmakers say they are attempting anew to give now-adult victims of child sexual abuse a reprieve from time limits in Pennsylvania law that prohibit them from suing perpetrators and institutions that may have covered it up. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

PHILADELPHIA — Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro vowed Wednesday to appeal what he described as a “last-minute and highly unusual” ruling that overturned Graham B. Spanier’s child endangerment conviction just hours before the former Pennsylvania State University president was scheduled to report to jail.

In a statement, the state’s top prosecutor said his office would ask the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit in Philadelphia to review the decision.

He questioned the grounds on which Scranton-based U.S. District Judge Karoline Mehalchick intervened late Tuesday to spare Spanier from incarceration for his alleged mishandling of a 2001 claim that former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky had sexually abused a boy.

“Federal courts have very limited power to act in state criminal proceedings,” Shapiro wrote. “This ruling plainly exceeded that power.”

Spanier, 70, had been ordered to report to jail Wednesday morning. In her ruling, Mehalchick concluded he had been improperly tried under a version of state child endangerment laws that were not in place at the time of his alleged crime.

She gave prosecutors 90 days to retry the former university president under the law as it stood back then.

But an appeal from Shapiro’s office threatens to upend that timeline and fan the flames of a debate that has plagued the campus for nearly eight years.

Ardent Penn State supporters — including several of the school’s trustees — maintain that prosecutors, the media and the Penn State board members rushed to judgment in an effort to appear responsive to Sandusky’s crimes. Spanier and his attorneys have declined to comment.

Shapiro, who has staked his first term as attorney general on prosecuting child sex abusers and their enablers, namely within the Catholic Church, described the evidence against Spanier as clear.

“Graham Spanier … was personally advised that children were being sexually abused on school property,” the statement read. “Evidence proved he chose not to help the children — but instead to cover up the abuse, despite being well aware of his responsibility as a supervisor.”

Spanier and two top aides — former Penn State athletic director Tim Curley and ex-university vice president Gary Schultz — were convicted in 2017 on misdemeanor counts of child endangerment tied to their failure to adequately respond to the 2001 complaint from then-graduate student Mike McQueary.

McQueary has said he reported that he saw Sandusky abusing a boy in a locker room shower, though Spanier maintains what was described to him was nothing more than horseplay.

He, Curley and Schultz agreed to a plan to notify The Second Mile, Sandusky’s charity for at-risk youth and the source of many of the ex-football coach’s victims, and to bar Sandusky from bringing boys onto campus.

But they did not report McQueary’s complaint to authorities.

Mehalchick, a Penn State grad, found in her ruling Tuesday that state law at the time required only “a parent, guardian or other person supervising the welfare of children” to report suspected abuse and that Spanier could not have reasonably foreseen in 2001 that he would have been included under that statute.

The law was revised in 2007 to also include people that “employ or supervise such a person” — a category Dauphin County Common Pleas Court Judge John Boccabella mentioned when instructing the jury on the law at the conclusion of Spanier’s trial.

In doing so, Mehalchick wrote, Boccabella violated the university president’s constitutional protections against being charged with laws that were not in place at the time.

Prosecutors maintain — and will likely argue again on appeal — that the 2007 revision did not change the law but only clarified a category of mandatory reporter that had been inherently included before.

Once ranked among the most well-respected, highest paid and longest-serving university presidents, Spanier was ousted from his post in the days after Sandusky’s arrest in 2011. He has since said he regretted not acting more forcefully at the time of the McQueary complaint.

Curley and Schultz both pleaded guilty to misdemeanor child endangerment charges and testified as government witnesses in Spanier’s case. Both have since served jail terms and waived their appellate rights as part of their plea agreement with the government.

Sandusky is serving a 30- to 60-year sentence at a state prison in Somerset County.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.