ShareThis Page
Attorney General sues Verizon over Amazon perks |

Attorney General sues Verizon over Amazon perks

Jacob Tierney

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro has sued Verizon for allegedly violating the Consumer Protection Law by not delivering free items it promised new customers.

According to the lawsuit, Verizon offered free Amazon Echo devices and Amazon Prime subscriptions for customers who signed up for a two-year phone contract.

This promotion started in late 2018.

Customers could click a link on their account page on Verizon’s website to redeem their free items, but in some cases the link was missing, according to the lawsuit.

Those who contacted Verizon to report the issue were told the company knew about the problem and worked to fix it, but the problem lasted more than a month, the lawsuit said.

Customers found themselves locked into their contracts, which had early termination fees of up to $350, without the perks they were promised, the lawsuit said.

Verizon continued to offer free Amazon Echo devices to new subscribers despite knowing about the problems, according to the lawsuit.

“If a company chooses to promise incentives to consumers signing up for their services, it is their legal responsibility to deliver on these promises,” Shapiro said in a statement.

It is unknown how many customers were affected by these problems.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.