Bedford County man charged with sale of guns stolen from federal custody | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Bedford County man charged with sale of guns stolen from federal custody

Patrick Varine
1507777_web1_GunSingle
Tribune-Review file
A 38-year-old Everett man was charged with selling weapons, components and ammunition stolen from a federal facility.

A Bedford County man has been charged in connection with the theft and sale of multiple guns from a federal facility.

Richard A. Schreiber, 38, of Everett in eastern Bedford County faces eight charges related to the sale of weapons found to be stolen from the National Firearms and Ammunition Destruction (NFAD) Branch, a facility used by the federal bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms as well as other law enforcement groups.

ATF officials began an investigation in February , when a gun seized in Philadelphia was found to have a serial number for a slide component that was supposed to have been destroyed at the NFAD facility.

U.S. Attorney Scott Brady said Schreiber allegedly sold firearms — along with components and ammunition — taken from the facility by Christopher L. Yates, an employee of Allied Security working at NFAD, according to a federal indictment.

Yates has been charged with similar offenses in the Northern District of West Virginia, federal officials said.

ATF officials said Yates took more than five machine guns, 115 pistols and revolvers, and 3,000 slides and pieces of ammunition from NFAD custody. Agents seized 101 firearms, 1,352 slides and more than 123,000 rounds of ammunition from Schreiber, as well as 28 firearms from people to whom he sold weapons.

Schreiber faces up to 65 years in prison as well as a possible $2 million fine.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.