Bill would assist grandparents raising children in the wake of opioid epidemic |

Bill would assist grandparents raising children in the wake of opioid epidemic

Deb Erdley

A coalition of Midwestern and Northeastern senators from some of the states hardest hit by the opioid epidemic want to open additional resources to grandparents and other relatives who have taken on child rearing duties in the wake of the addiction crisis.

Citing the needs of more than 100,000 children in Pennsylvania now being raised by grandparents and other relatives, U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, D-Scranton, joined Sens.Sherrod Brown, D-OH, Tammy Baldwin, D-WI and Maggie Hassan, D-NH, to cosponsor the Grandfamilies Act.

A Casey spokesman said the law would increase access to Social Security child’s benefits and the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families cash assistance program. It also would provide incentives for states to create temporary guardianship laws for grandparents who need to step in quickly to help a grandchild and provide support for housing specifically provided for grandparents raising grandchildren.

The new measure comes in the wake of the passage last summer of the Supporting Grandparents Raising Grandchildren Act, a law that set up resource centers for grandparents thrust back into parenting roles.

Casey said he continues to hear pleas for help from grandparents across Pennsylvania trying to pick of the pieces of lives shattered by opioid addiction.

“I believe the federal government needs to do more. This is why I introduced the Grandfamilies Act to help relieve some of the financial burden many grandparents face as they take on the unexpected challenge of parenting a second time around,” Casey said.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.