Bills to combat child sexual abuse move ahead in Pennsylvania Legislature |

Bills to combat child sexual abuse move ahead in Pennsylvania Legislature

Associated Press
The Pennsylvania State Capitol seen from State Street in Harrisburg. The Capitol’s centerpiece is a 272-foot tall dome.

HARRISBURG — Two related bills designed to help victims of child sexual abuse received favorable committee votes in the Pennsylvania House on Monday and are poised to pass the full chamber in the coming days.

The House Judiciary Committee voted overwhelmingly for a bill that would eliminate the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse crimes and for a constitutional amendment that would permit child sexual abuse lawsuits that would otherwise be outdated during a two-year period.

Both measures are widely supported in the House, but the state Senate’s Republican majority blocked similar legislation last year.

Rep. Mark Rozzi, D-Berks, a leading advocate for child sexual abuse-related legislation in the House, said dividing proposals between a bill and a constitutional amendment could make it easier to get something enacted.

“I’m hoping that this is one we can not only get through the House, but get through the Senate,” Rozzi said before the bill passed with only one no vote.

It would do away with the criminal statute of limitations for child sexual abuse crimes entirely and give victims of future abuse until age 55 to file lawsuits. Current law gives victims until age 30 to pursue criminal charges and until age 50 to sue.

Rep. Paul Schemel, R-Franklin, said he was opposed because he saw the measure as a potential overreach that could violate the rights of those accused of crimes.

“We have statutes of limitations for reasons,” Schemel said.

But Rep. Dan Miller, D-Allegheny, said it often takes many years for victims of child sexual abuse to come forward.

“We know that kids need a little more time; the kids need help,” Miller said.

The proposed constitutional amendment, which would create the two-year lawsuit window, must pass both chambers in two consecutive two-year sessions and then be approved by voters.

Rozzi said one goal is “to put the Senate on record voting to support victims.”

“At some point we need to step up and do what’s right,” Rozzi told reporters after the committee votes. “I can’t make the Senate do what’s right.”

A Senate Republican spokeswoman said the caucus plans to evaluate the legislation once something comes over from the House.

Schemel voted against the proposed amendment, as did Rep. Chris Rabb, D-Philadelphia. Rabb said he could not vote for a constitutional amendment if a committee hearing has not been held on the topic.

A state grand jury report last year concluded about 300 Roman Catholic priests had abused more than 1,000 children over seven decades.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.