Casey, Toomey react to plea-deal controversy surrounding Labor Secretary Acosta |

Casey, Toomey react to plea-deal controversy surrounding Labor Secretary Acosta

Nicole C. Brambila
In this Sept. 17, 2018, file photo, President Donald Trump, left, and Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta listen during a meeting of the President’s National Council of the American Worker in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

Pennsylvania’s U.S. senators disagree whether Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta should resign amid growing criticism over a 2008 plea deal he negotiated with an accused sex offender who now faces new sex-trafficking charges.

U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, D-Scranton, joined a growing chorus that includes House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York that is calling for Acosta’s resignation.

A spokesman for U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Lehigh Valley, said a federal investigation into whether Acosta mishandled the past case against billionaire Jeffrey Epstein while serving as U.S. Attorney for South Florida should continue.

“As U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta provided a child predator, Jeffrey Epstein, with a sweetheart plea deal that was kept secret from his numerous underage victims and their families,” Casey said in a statement. “As an appointed official, Secretary Acosta should resign for his part in perpetuating this cycle of abuse.”

Under the plea deal, Epstein pleaded guilty to lesser state charges and was sentenced to 13 months in jail on a release program that allowed him to work six days a week after being accused of sexually abusing dozens of young girls. He also was required to make payments to victims and register as a sex offender.

Epstein’s indictment Monday in the Southern District of New York and a raid on the financier’s mansion that police say uncovered a cache of child pornography is the driving force behind calls for Acosta’s resignation.

“The crimes Jeffrey Epstein has committed and has recently been accused of are heinous,” Toomey spokesman Bill Jaffee said in an email to the Tribune-Review. “The Department of Justice is reviewing whether federal prosecutors at the time mishandled Mr. Epstein’s case. Senator Toomey believes it’s important for that investigation to continue. If any misconduct is discovered, he believes those responsible should face severe consequences.”

Acosta has said the deal was the toughest he could wrangle in a difficult, complex case.

“With the evidence available more than a decade ago, federal prosecutors insisted that Epstein go to jail, register as a sex offender and put the world on notice that he was a sexual predator,” Acosta said via Twitter Tuesday.

Nicole C. Brambila is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Nicole at 724-226-7704, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.