ShareThis Page
Central Pa. leaders, residents speak out about Pittsburgh gun ban | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Central Pa. leaders, residents speak out about Pittsburgh gun ban

1010040_web1_PTR-GunbillSigned03-041019
Supporters of new gun legislation look on as Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto signs a package of bills during a signing ceremony inside of the City-County Building on April 9, 2019.

LEWISBURG — The gun control legislation passed by Pittsburgh’s City Council and signed by Mayor Bill Peduto on Tuesday spurred Susquehanna Valley leaders and a hunter to speak out in favor of — and against — the law, which prohibits the use of military assault-type weapons.

Lewisburg Mayor Judy Wagner, of Moms Demand Action, said weapons such as the AR-15 assault weapon that was used in the Tree of Life Synagogue massacre should not be readily available to average citizens.

“These weapons are not for sportsmen,” Wagner said, “and I fail to see the need of an average citizen to have them. I worry about children who are sitting ducks in a classroom and other victims. There’s just too much of this.”

Standing outside of Young’s Sporting Goods in Northumberland Borough on Wednesday afternoon, Harold McConnell, of Lewisburg, a hunter and a gun owner, said he opposed the Pittsburgh law — in principal.

“I’m a Second Amendment guy, although I have to say, I can’t see why I would ever want to own or use an AR-15 assault rifle,” he said. “Other than it being a cool looking weapon, I don’t know any of my hunter friends who would buy one.”

Legislation limiting the ownership of any kind of weapon would be, he believes, “a first step toward a more strict gun control in this country, and I am not for that. It’s why I oppose the law. But I do understand the issue around the use of assault weapons and the shooting in Pittsburgh was just horrible.”

Cynthia Peltier, co-founder and director of the Community Zone, disagrees with McConnell’s stance, but said she is for “responsible gun ownership.”

“I am not for taking away people’s guns,” she said. “I am all for people who own guns for their own protection. Some people have a knee-jerk reaction when they hear about gun control, they see it as a slippery slope. I have to ask: Who needs to have military-style assault weapons? I’m glad to hear that the government in Pittsburgh is trying to do something about it. I applaud them for this action.”

The Pittsburgh law would also ban most uses of armor-piercing ammunition and high-capacity magazines, and allows the temporary seizure of guns from people who are determined to be a danger to themselves or others. The city and its leaders are facing mounting lawsuits over the bill.

Shari Jacobson, speaking Wednesday afternoon on behalf of Moms Demand Action, Lewisburg chapter, said “that this is a complex issue, and we’re looking into it.”

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.