Cheyney trustees fined for missing financial disclosures and back dated filings |

Cheyney trustees fined for missing financial disclosures and back dated filings

Deb Erdley

The Pennsylvania Ethics Commission on Monday announced it has fined a pair of Cheyney University of Pennsylvania trustees $500 each for failing to file financial disclosure forms for years and then back dating current forms to make it appear they had complied with the law in prior years.

Authorities discovered Cheyney trustees Larry Skinner and Joseph Wells neglected to file state financial disclosure forms for years during a routine compliance audit at Cheyney last summer.

Cheyney, one of the nation’s oldest historically black universities is located in Eastern Pennsylvania, just outside of Philadelphia. The financially struggling school is among 14 state-owned universities in the Pennsylvanian State System of Higher Education.

According to an Ethics Commission order released Monday, Skinner and Wells, when told of the missing forms, quickly filled out blank disclosure forms from 2018, then back dated them to make it appear they had been filed timely and submitted them.

In addition to the fines, the Ethics Commission ordered the men to file accurate forms for all prior years.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.