Coal still fuels economic fire in Pennsylvania, industry study reports |

Coal still fuels economic fire in Pennsylvania, industry study reports

Stephen Huba

Don’t rule the coal industry out as an economic force in Pennsylvania just yet.

A new study — conducted by the Allegheny Conference on Community Development and commissioned by the Pennsylvania Coal Alliance — found that coal mining accounts for nearly $7 billion in economic activity in the state, including $4.6 billion directly from mining and $2.27 billion from indirect and induced contributions.

Indirect spending primarily comes from supply-chain industries, while induced spending comes from employees who buy goods and services.

The study looked at the annual impact the coal industry has on Pennsylvania’s economy, using 2017 as a baseline year.

The state’s coal industry generated 17,770 jobs in 2017, including 6,000 directly tied to mining activity and 11,000 related to the supply chain and support services, the study said.

Despite a downward trend because of competition from natural gas, coal remains a significant source of energy in Pennsylvania and the U.S., the study said.

Of the 47.2 million tons of bituminous coal produced in Pennsylvania in 2017, 58% was used for electric power generation. What’s more, Pennsylvania coal was shipped to 23 states.

“This study confirms that Pennsylvania-mined coal continues to make valuable contributions to the state’s economy through its hard-working people,” PCA Executive Director Rachel Gleason said. “Equally important is the fact that many of those jobs and the economic ripple they create through the purchase of local goods and services are found in smaller communities.”

The study was completed using data from federal and state government sources, noting the industry produced 49 million tons of coal during the period, with exports of bituminous coal increasing 117 percent over 2016 levels.

Acknowledging the growth in natural gas, Gleason said coal constitutes 29% of the electric power portfolio in the PJM Interconnection grid — 13 states, plus Washington, D.C. — and 20% of the portfolio within the state of Pennsylvania.

After a decade of declines, coal production has stabilized and is expected to remain steady for several years, Gleason said, citing the international demand for metallurgical coal and increased stability in the thermal coal markets.

“The retirements Pennsylvania has experienced with some coal-burning power plants has slowed down greatly, and the remaining facilities are operating efficiently and equipped with advanced air-emission control systems,” Gleason said. “This is expected to translate into more consistent demand for Pennsylvania’s thermal coal.”

Coal mines in Somerset, Cambria and Indiana counties are known for their metallurgical coal, which is used to make the coke that fuels steel mills.

Canonsburg-based Corsa Coal Corp. in June 2017 opened the Acosta Deep Mine in Jenner Township, Somerset County, to much fanfare, including a congratulatory call from President Trump. The mine is expected to produce 400,000 saleable tons of metallurgical coal per year.

This month, Johnstown-­based LCT Energy LP announced that it is hiring and planning to go into full production for the Rustic Ridge Mine near Donegal. The mine, which straddles the Westmoreland County-Fayette County line, will be developed for metallurgical coal.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.