ShareThis Page
Commission hears dispute over school’s ‘Redskins’ nickname | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Commission hears dispute over school’s ‘Redskins’ nickname

Associated Press
| Monday, January 7, 2019 9:06 p.m
614797_web1_gBJfMYeY

LANGHORNE — A long-running dispute over a Pennsylvania school district’s “Redskins” nickname for its sports teams has been taken up by a state commission.

Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission attorney Lisa Knight argues the Bucks County district wouldn’t use a nickname based on any other racial group, so they should not use the current “Redskins” nickname either. Philly.com reports Neshaminy’s attorney Craig Ginsburg argues that students aren’t offended by the nickname and that it has been in use for over 60 years.

The dispute dates back to 2013 when the PHRC received a complaint which then resulted in the commission filing its own charge which accused Neshaminy of violating a state human-relations law.

Also in 2013, the high school’s student newspaper moved to ban the word “Redskins” from the publication.

If the hearings result in a finding of discrimination, the commission could order the district to change its nickname.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.