ShareThis Page
Daisyfield sausage recalled, may contain rubber |

Daisyfield sausage recalled, may contain rubber

Jeff Himler
| Wednesday, January 9, 2019 9:00 p.m

An Ohio company is recalling about 1,719 pounds of Daisyfield brand raw pork sausage products that may be contaminated with rubber.

J. H. Routh Packing Co. of Sandusky issued the recall for seven varieties of the ground sausage products that were produced from Jan. 1 through Friday and were distributed to retailers in Pennsylvania, Ohio and Kentucky. The company reported the problem on Monday to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, which announced the recall Wednesday.

Included in the recall are 5-pound packages of : Loose, bulk fresh pork sausage or Italian sausage in plastic containers; large link, country-style rope, small breakfast-style link fresh pork sausage or large link or country-style rope Italian sausage in paper-lined, cardboard packages.

The products bear the establishment number “EST. 818” inside the federal inspection mark.

Officials advised consumers to discard the products or return them to the place of purchase. There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions from consuming the products, according to FSIS.

When a retail distribution list for the products becomes available, it will be posted at

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, or via Twitter @jhimler_news.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.