ShareThis Page
DEP must take a closer look at air-quality permits for Mariner East processing facility |

DEP must take a closer look at air-quality permits for Mariner East processing facility

Patrick Varine
| Thursday, January 10, 2019 7:45 p.m
Submitted photo
Above, a satellite photo of Sunoco’s facillities in Marcus Hook, Pa.
Tribune-Review file
Pipes cross U.S. Route 13 in Sunoco Logistics’ Marcus Hook Industrial Complex in Delaware County on Sept. 14, 2015.

The processing equipment designed to handle natural gas liquids from Sunoco’s Mariner East pipelines was unlawfully issued an air-quality permit, according to the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board.

The board ruled on Wednesday that the state’s Department of Environmental Protection erred in assessing multiple projects at Sunoco’s Marcus Hook, Pa., facility on their own individual pollution merits, rather than aggregating them to determine if more stringent air-quality requirements are necessary.

“The larger project was unlawfully broken up into smaller projects for the sake of permitting,” wrote Clean Air Council officials in a statement issued Thursday. The Clean Air Council appealed DEP approval of part of the Marcus Hook project plans in 2016, which led to a May 2018 trial.

The Environmental Hearing Board’s decision sends the air-quality permit back to DEP so its officials can re-evaluate how the project should be permitted.

Sunoco officials said they look forward to working with the DEP.

“(The) ruling has no impact on the construction and operation activities authorized under Plan Approval E while the PA DEP conducts an analysis of the permit, which we feel was permitted correctly,” said Lisa Dillinger, spokeswoman for Sunoco’s parent company Energy Transfer.

“The Environmental Hearing Board’s decision is not only a victory for Clean Air Council, it is a victory for public health and the neighboring communities,” said Joseph Otis Minott, executive director and chief counsel for the Clean Air Council. “Too often, big industry players have avoided pollution controls by creating loopholes that jeopardize air quality protections.”

Dillinger viewed it differently.

”We will work with the PA DEP to provide them with the appropriate information for their review, and we are pleased that the overriding outcome was the Environmental Hearing Board’s denial of the Clean Air Council’s request to revoke the permit,” she said.

Click here to read the board’s full written decision.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.