Derry Township farmer: To save dairies, modernize milk pricing system | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Derry Township farmer: To save dairies, modernize milk pricing system

Stephen Huba
640577_web1_gtr-milkcows3-020318
Patrick Varine | Tribune-Review
Rick Ebert, 58, of Derry Township feeds some of the cows on his dairy farm off Livermore Road in February 2018. Ebert also is president of the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau.

Faced with chronically low milk prices, some Pennsylvania dairy farmers are calling for reforms in the way those prices are set.

The U.S. system for determining what dairy farmers are paid for their product is notoriously complex — and has become even more so under the influence of global markets and recent trade wars.

“Dairy farmers are hurting right now,” said Pennsylvania Farm Bureau President Rick Ebert, a dairy farmer in Derry Township. “We’re no longer tied to just what we produce in the United States — we’re dependent on export markets. There’s a lot of world dairy products out there, which affects our price also.”

Ebert is attending the annual convention of the American Farm Bureau Federation in New Orleans, where delegates debated a resolution calling for further study of the American pricing system.

“I think it needs (to be) modernized,” he said. “Throughout the years, there’s been some updates to it but not really a complete look at it.”

The resolution calls for the formation of a committee that would “take a hard look at the federal order system and how milk is priced and see what needs (to be) updated,” Ebert said.

A similar proposal is part of an online petition being circulated by the Progressive Agriculture Organization, or Pro-Ag, a group of dairy farmers based in Wyoming County.

The petition on the website Change.org calls for, among other things, a new pricing formula that factors in the dairy farmers’ cost of production, and a $20 per hundredweight floor price for milk used to manufacture dairy products.

“Actions must be taken to preserve our remaining dairy farms,” the petition says.

Wyoming County dairy farmer Arden Tewksbury, manager of Pro-Ag, said such measures would add security and stability to the dairy industry at a time when dairy farmers often feel unsupported by both consumers and the government.

“We are insisting that the Congress and USDA have immediate hearings to discuss what’s going on with dairy farmers because we’re losing them left and right. Something’s got to be done,” Tewksbury said.

According to Pro-Ag, the number of dairy farmers in the United States has declined from nearly 360,000 in 1981 to the present level of about 40,000. Pennsylvania, the nation’s sixth-largest dairy producer, lost 200 dairy farms in 2016 and 2017, and currently has about 6,570 dairy farms, according to the Center for Dairy Excellence.

The travails of dairy farmers continue to be driven by a glut of fluid milk, declining demand, low prices and the vagaries of international markets, forcing some producers to sell at a loss or consider dairy alternatives such as cheese, yogurt and ice cream.

In 2014, milk prices — what the market was willing to pay the farmer — were at their highest recorded level in Pennsylvania. That price dropped 28 percent in 2015 and has continued to go down, according to PennState Extension.

Milk is typically priced and sold in 100-pound increments (hundredweight), which equals about 12 gallons.

The price farmers receive for raw milk is largely determined by market forces that are influenced by federal and state dairy programs. Under most of these programs, the minimum farm milk price is based on the value of the products made from it — fluid milk, “soft” products such as ice cream, “hard” products such as cheese and “dry” products such as nonfat dry milk, according to the International Dairy Foods Association.

In Pennsylvania, price regulation of milk is covered in part by Federal Milk Marketing Orders, or FMMOs, and partly by a state order, according to the Congressional Research Service. Dating back to the 1930s, the FMMO system is the mechanism by which the government sets the minimum price that producers receive for their milk.

The Pro-Ag petition calls for a new pricing formula that takes into account dairy farmers’ cost of production, but Ebert said that would be difficult because such costs vary widely based on the size of the farm, debt load and input costs.

“We’ve got to get a different pricing formula for dairy farmers,” Tewksbury said. “The dairy farmers get no consideration for their costs, yet processors get a credit for their costs.”

Ebert said the Farm Bureau does not support the $20 price floor proposal because it would be tantamount to price fixing.

The Pro-Ag petition also calls on U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue to conduct milk hearings across the country, “giving our average dairy farmers an opportunity to tell you how deplorable conditions are on the majority of our dairy farms.”

Although things look bleak, a recent report by PennState Extension said milk prices may see a boost in the fall.


Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter @shuba_trib.


Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.