Ex-Penn State worker gets up to 23 months in jail for bathroom recordings | TribLIVE.com

Ex-Penn State worker gets up to 23 months in jail for bathroom recordings


A former Penn State employee charged with recording more than 20 people in a Bryce Jordan Center bathroom has received his jail sentence.

On Thursday, Centre County Judge Brian Marshall sentenced Charles Chamberlin Jr., 55, to six to 23.5 months in the county jail, along with three years of probation. Chamberlin, of Spring Mills, also must register as a sex offender for 15 years, according to the decision.

A Penn State police investigation began in May when a 17-year-old high school student attending the State College Area School District prom in the Jordan Center said Chamberlin led him to a restroom “well away” from the event, then followed him in and used a stall directly beside his, according to the criminal complaint.

The student — who attended an undisclosed school district — heard Chamberlin use his iPhone to record him before he ran out of the restroom with a “shocked” look on his face, according to the complaint.

“This will always be his recollection of his prom night,” Assistant District Attorney Matt Metzger said.

A search of Chamberlin’s phone revealed 37 videos of 22 men urinating in the same restroom from April 2017 to April 2018, police said.

The State College school district was “saddened that something this troubling” was reported, Superintendent Bob O’Donnell said in June. The allegations were “deeply disturbing” to Penn State, university spokeswoman Lisa Powers said.

Chamberlin’s prison sentence is scheduled to begin Friday. He pleaded guilty in January to 38 misdemeanor charges of invasion of privacy.

“What are you supposed to say?” defense attorney Jim Bryant said after the sentence was announced. “A picture is worth a thousand words and six to 23 (months).”

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.