Flat Medicaid rates concern Pennsylvania nursing homes | TribLIVE.com

Flat Medicaid rates concern Pennsylvania nursing homes


A group that represents about 500 nursing home operators across Pennsylvania expressed concerns about Gov. Tom Wolf’s proposed budget for next fiscal year, saying flat funding threatens the state’s rapidly aging population.

The Medicaid reimbursement rate for Pennsylvania nursing home residents has increased less than $9 a day since July 1, 2010, according to the Pennsylvania Health Care Association. Wolf’s proposed budget does not include a rate increase.

“It gets to a point where, after years of being asked to do more with less, you simply can’t do more. We are at a breaking point,” said association Chairman Sean Buckman, who is president and CEO of Carbondale Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in Lackawanna County.

Association spokesman Eric Kiehl said reimbursements haven’t kept pace with expenses.

Over the past decade, the reimbursement rate has risen 4.2 percent. Wolf increased the reimbursement last fiscal year by 1 percent, or 99 cents per resident, per day.

Costs in that time have gone up about 7.3 percent, from $207.22 to $249.96 per resident, per day, according to the association.

“The cost of care is rising, as are the costs for everything from labor to drugs and medical supplies to food and utilities,” Buckman said.

About two-thirds of nursing home patients receive care through Medicaid, the federal safety net for the poor and elderly, which reimburses nursing homes at rates lower than Medicare or private insurance.

The quality of nursing home care has become a growing concern as Pennsylvanians get older and more are expected to need these services.

Released last month, Wolf’s proposed $34.1 billion general fund budget represents a 6.8 percent increase over this fiscal year’s actual budget of $31.9 billion.

The Medicaid reimbursement is $198.97, or just $8.12 cents more per patient, per day than a decade ago.

“Gov. Wolf is committed to continuing to improve health care quality and access across the board,” J.J. Abbott, the governor’s spokesman, said in an email to the Tribune-Review.

That includes in-home services, which run significantly cheaper than institutional care, Abbott said.

Abbott said the governor “remains open to input on areas where there could be need to address rates due to higher costs in the health care system but believes the conversation is more complicated than just giving more taxpayer funding to privately operated nursing homes.”

Nicole C. Brambila is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Nicole at 724-226-7704, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Health Now | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.