Former Pa. Congress members tackle civics education |

Former Pa. Congress members tackle civics education

Deb Erdley

It might be time to hit the civics books.

Citing recent surveys that found only 26% of Americans could name all three branches of government and 37% could not name any of the rights guaranteed by First Amendment, a coalition of former Pennsylvania members of Congress is joining with eight groups across the state to promote civics education.

A spokesman for the PA Civics Coalition said the group wants to help promote civics education in schools and communities across the state prior to the 2020-21 school year when state law will require that all Pennsylvania students in grades 8-12 be tested for civics knowledge.

“Our coalition members are excited about the various ways PA Civics can help lead statewide efforts to promote civics education in our schools and communities in the coming years,” former Congressman Jim Gerlach said announcing the initiative. “Great citizens are not born, they are made. We want to do all we can to help provide students and fellow citizens the knowledge, skills, and opportunities for action that will contribute to a more vibrant civic health in (Pennsylvania) and our nation.”

Former Congress members on the coalition include Chris Carney, Jim Coyne, Phil English, Jim Gerlach, Melissa Hart, Joe Hoeffel and Tim Holden. U.S. District Court Judge John E. Jones III and York County Common Pleas Judge Todd Platts also are participating in the group.

Organizations supporting the effort include: National Constitution Center, the Senator John Heinz History Center, the Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge, the PA Council of Social Studies, the Pennsylvania Bar Association, the Annenberg Public Policy Center, the Committee of Seventy and the Rendell Center for Civics and Civic Engagement.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.