Former Penn State Pres Graham Spanier ordered to prison – finally – in Sandusky scandal |

Former Penn State Pres Graham Spanier ordered to prison – finally – in Sandusky scandal

Deb Erdley
In this March 20, 2017, file photo, former Penn State president Graham Spanier walks to the Dauphin County Courthouse in Harrisburg, Pa. Spanier lost an appeal Tuesday, June 26, 2018, of his misdemeanor conviction for child endangerment over his handling of a 2001 complaint about Jerry Sandusky showering with a boy in the football team locker room.

The long-running criminal court drama over the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal moved to a conclusion Wednesday when a judge ordered Penn State’s former president to finally report to prison in three weeks.

Graham Spanier, 70, has been free on bond pending appeals since his 2017 jury conviction for failing to report a 2001 complaint about Sandusky showering with a child in a Penn State locker room to authorities. Spanier will serve a two-month sentence on a misdemeanor conviction for child endangerment charges.

In February, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court declined to hear additional appeals from the former Penn State leader.

Sandusky, a retired Penn State assistant football coach who founded a charity for at-risk youth, was sentenced to 30-60 years in prison in 2012. A jury found him guilty of 45 counts of sexually abusing boys in and around Penn State facilities over a decade.

Senior Berks County Judge John A. Boccabella, who presided at Spanier’s trial, on Wednesday ordered the former university president to report to prison at 9 a.m. May 1.

Spanier led Penn State for 16 years. He was ousted from his post in November 2011, after a grand jury probe that culminated in charges against Sandusky raised questions about the university’s oversight of the assistant football coach.

Spanier and two other Penn State administrators were prosecuted on charges that they failed to report allegations against Sandusky years earlier.

Former athletic director Tim Curley and former vice president Gary Schultz were sentenced to jail time in 2017. Each pleaded guilty to child endangerment. Curley was sentenced to 7-to-23 months in prison, while Schultz was sentenced to 6-to-23 months.

In addition to serving two months in prison, Spanier was ordered to serve two months of house arrest.

Although Spanier was tried and convicted in Dauphin County, Boccabella agreed he may serve his sentence in the Centre County Prison near his State College home, if authorities there approve the arrangement.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.