Gettysburg College trustee quits over Nazi uniform photo |

Gettysburg College trustee quits over Nazi uniform photo

Associated Press
In this photo from the 1980 edition of Spectrum, the Gettysburg College yearbook, Bob Garthwait, right, wears a costume that depicts a Nazi uniform at a fraternity event. Garthwait, a financial donor and college trustee, apologized and announced his resignation from the board of trustees Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2019.
Bob Garthwait is accused of wearing a uniform with a swastika on it.

GETTYSBURG — A Pennsylvania college trustee apologized and announced his resignation Tuesday after a student found a 1980 yearbook photo in which the trustee wore a Nazi uniform at a fraternity event.

Gettysburg College President Janet Morgan Riggs said in an email to the college community that Bob Garthwait decided to step down from the board of trustees.

Garthwait is a financial donor to the college and helped found the Garthwait Leadership Center on campus.

A student brought the photo to the attention of a faculty member last week, and the administration was contacted.

The student newspaper, the Gettysburgian, published an image of the photo , which depicts Garthwait in a uniform with a swastika armband and four other people, including at least one other who also appears to be in a military uniform. They were standing next to drawings of razor wire and someone trying to climb a fence.

The photo surfaced weeks after the disclosure of a photo on the medical school yearbook page for Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam that showed one person in blackface and another in Ku Klux Klan robes. The state’s attorney general, Mark Herring, then came forward to say that he had dressed in blackface in college.

Riggs’ email quotes a message from Garthwait that says he dressed as a Nazi soldier in a POW camp as part of a “Hogan’s Heroes” TV show theme party at a fraternity.

Garthwait, who did not return a message seeking comment left at his workplace, said that, as a college sophomore, he “was not fully aware of the significance of those symbols.”

“My sincere hope is that our current students will learn from my poor judgment 38 years ago and be more thoughtful than I was about the impact of their actions on others,” Garthwait said in Riggs’ email. “I extend my sincere apologies to the entire Gettysburg College community, and I humbly ask for your forgiveness.”

Student Hannah Labovitz, a sophomore history major from Mt. Lebanon, said another student showed her the photo last week, and by the next day she had figured out that Garthwait was the person in the photo wearing a swastika armband.

Labovitz said Garthwait’s resignation from the board shows he understands “how serious the situation is.”

“It wasn’t just him — it was the school that allowed this to be in the yearbook and there were zero complaints when it was allowed to be published,” Labovitz said Tuesday.

Riggs said in the email to the campus community that she learned of the photo on Sunday and met with the students who brought it to light on Monday.

“Anti-Semitism clearly contradicts our values as an institution today, as it did when this photo was taken,” Riggs said, promising discussions with the board about the matter.

Gettysburg College Judaic studies professor Stephen Stern, who was shown the photo by Labovitz last week, urged the school to return Garthwait’s donations.

“The longer we hang onto the money, the longer and more conflicted the story becomes,” Stern said.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.