ShareThis Page
Gov. Tom Wolf on anti-abortion bills: ‘I would veto it’ | TribLIVE.com
Politics Election

Gov. Tom Wolf on anti-abortion bills: ‘I would veto it’

Emily Balser
1165566_web1_716300-d8875873258d4e79b473985671456379
Matt Rourke | Associated Press
This file photo shows Gov. Tom Wolf during a state budget event earlier this year. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Gov. Tom Wolf announced Thursday he will never allow an anti-abortion bill to make it into law while he’s governor.

Wolf, in a video statement posted on social media, referenced other states that have recently passed antiabortion bills including Alabama and Georgia, where they have already been signed into law.

Missouri lawmakers are also considering similar measures.

Alabama’s law virtually outlaws all abortions except when a woman’s life is in danger. Georgia’s law bans abortion once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which can be as early as six weeks, before many women know they are pregnant.

“If such a bill were to come to my desk I would veto it,” Wolf said.

Wolf said those bills “seek to place a politician between a woman and her doctor when it comes to the most important medical decision she’s ever going to make.”

The Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed legislation Tuesday that would outlaw abortions because of a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome.

The Republican-controlled House passed the bill, 117-76, after two hours of debate. Wolf’s office has said the governor would veto that bill if it made it to his desk.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.