Gun debate revived in Pennsylvania statehouse |

Gun debate revived in Pennsylvania statehouse

Associated Press
Pennsylvania’s Senate Judiciary Committee chairwoman, Republican Lisa Baker, left, and the committee’s ranking Democrat, Larry Farnese, listen during testimony in a hearing on firearms related issues, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2019 in Harrisburg, Pa.
Pennsylvania’s House Judiciary Committee chairman, Republican Rob Kauffman, left, listens to Democratic Rep. Chris Rabb speak during a voting meeting on firearms-related legislation, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2019 in Harrisburg, Pa. Looking on is the committee’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Tim Briggs.

The debate over guns was revived Tuesday in Pennsylvania’s Republican-controlled Legislature after a year of shocking violence, although Democrats went away frustrated and warning the process could end up actually loosening gun laws.

The day marked the start of a two-day Senate committee hearing on gun violence and a slate of House committee votes on gun-related legislation that drew some votes from Democrats, but also left untouched bills they have made their top priorities.

The House Judiciary Committee unanimously advanced legislation to more swiftly take away guns from someone who was involuntarily committed for mental health treatment, changing the period from 60 days to 48 hours.

However, another bill that passed the committee — to make it harder and more expensive for municipalities to defend their firearms ordinances against lawsuits — swiftly drew a veto threat from Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf.

The committee’s agenda did not include bills favored by Democrats and a handful of Republicans, including expanding background checks, requiring gun owners to report lost or stolen firearms, and empowering relatives or police to seek the immediate, if temporary, seizure of someone’s firearms.

After the hearing, Democrats got more unfavorable news.

“We don’t have any intention of addressing further gun control measures this session,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rob Kauffman, R-Franklin.

Kauffman framed the slate of bills as comprehensive and addressing weaknesses in how Pennsylvania keeps guns out of the hands of dangerous people without treading on gun ownership rights.

The committee also passed several bills to expand penalties for suspects committing crimes with guns, including reinstating mandatory minimums that had been struck down by courts as unconstitutional because Pennsylvania law lets judges, not juries, impose them using a lower standard of evidence.

In a statement, Wolf said he was extremely frustrated at Kauffman’s stand against further votes on gun control legislation and urged Kauffman to reconsider.

“As citizens across Pennsylvania demand gun safety action, the chairman is going in the opposite direction,” Wolf said.

The action follows rising gun violence in Philadelphia, which has brought calls for action, and last month’s wounding of six city police officers in a standoff with a suspect whose long criminal record barred him from legally owning a gun.

It is also 11 months removed from the deadliest attack on Jews in U.S. history and Pennsylvania’s worst mass shooting in at least decades, when a gunman authorities say expressed anti-Semitic hatred killed 11 people in Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life synagogue.

Pennsylvania’s Legislature is historically protective of gun rights, and a year ago passed its first anti-violence legislation in more than a decade that dealt directly with firearms. That bill forces people with a domestic violence ruling against them to more quickly surrender their guns.

Democrats remained hopeful that the Senate would still advance some sort of gun control measure in the coming months.

Among those testifying Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee were two emergency room physicians, Dr. Zoe Maher of Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia and Dr. Raquel Forsythe of UPMC Presbyterian in Pittsburgh, who was part of the medical team that responded to the Tree of Life shooting.

They told about daily battle to save gunshot victims coming into their emergency rooms, the staggering injuries that result and the families they have to tell when they can’t save someone.

Maher told senators that it is still within their reach to do something about gun violence, although it may not be within reach much longer.

“Everyone here has an opportunity to work together to make choices that are going to help our communities,” she told them.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.