Here’s how Pa. ranks in terms of women’s rights |

Here’s how Pa. ranks in terms of women’s rights

Megan Tomasic

Pennsylvania is pretty average when it comes to women’s rights.

A new study, the best and worst states for women’s rights, released by, a company that collects security data, research and studies, shows Pennsylvania ranks 29th with an overall score of over 46% compared to other states, based on economic freedom, education, health and reproductive freedom and political participation for women.

“We wanted to examine where women’s rights are strongest in the U.S., so we looked at things like income levels, educational achievement, reproductive rights and political representation to create a best-to-worst ranking of each state and the District of Columbia,” the website reads.

The top 10 were Washington D.C. (65.7%), Maine (57.4%), New Hampshire (55.8%), Oregon (54.7%), Iowa (53.5%), Washington (53.3%), New Mexico (52.9%), Hawaii (52.2%), Nevada (51.9%) and Colorado (51.9%).

The worst states were Louisiana (38.6%), Arkansas (38.9%), Utah (39.5%), Texas (39.7%), Oklahoma (40.6%), Mississippi (41.6%), South Carolina (41.9%), Indiana (42.2%), Tennessee (42.4%) and Georgia (42.7%).

“While some states certainly performed better than others, the truth is that no state stood out as being the far-and-away leader in women’s rights and every state has ample room for improvement,” the site reads. released the list almost a year prior to the 100th anniversary of the adoption of the 19th Amendment that guarantees women the right to vote.

Pennsylvania ranks 31st in terms of economic freedom, meaning having the ability to make decisions about everyday life; 25th in education, meaning the number of women with high school diplomas or an equivalent certificate; 27th for health and reproductive freedoms, which takes into account maternal mortality rates, lifespans and restrictions on abortion rights; and 32nd in political participation, according to the website.

To calculate the rankings, compared publicly available data regarding economic freedom, education, health and reproductive freedom and political participation. With those, officials used distinct metrics related to overall freedom, health and happiness, their website reads.

An average of those metrics was then calculated.

“No state really performed particularly well across all metrics,” the site reads.

“For instance, there are several states that have beat back measures limiting reproductive rights, but many of those same states have much-higher-than-median maternal mortality rates.”

Megan Tomasic is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.