Labor Day weekend vehicle crashes down slightly from last year |

Labor Day weekend vehicle crashes down slightly from last year

Nicole C. Brambila

The Pennsylvania State Police reported 5% fewer crashes on state-patrolled roads over the four-day Labor Day holiday compared to last year.

This year’s holiday weekend saw 684 crashes that injured 204 people. In 2018, there were 722 crashes that injured 224 people.

Across the state’s southwest region, which includes Allegheny and Westmoreland counties, there were 118 crashes, three fatalities and 52 injured. One of these holiday crashes includes the four people hospitalized – two in critical condition – after a vehicle traveling inbound on the Liberty Bridge crossed the median early Monday and struck another vehicle head-on.

State troopers also issued nearly 2,000 speeding tickets across the region and arrested 149 people on suspicion of driving under the influence.

Year-over-year, nearly all of the statewide crash and enforcement categories – including speeding and DUI arrests – were down. Alcohol-related crashes, however, saw the most significant drop with a 44% decrease.

Troopers handed out 11,742 speeding tickets and arrested 610 people for driving under the influence compared to more than 13,000 speeding citations and 643 DUI arrests last year.

But seven people were killed in seven separate crashes, one which involved alcohol. Last year, there were six fatal crashes, three alcohol related.

Labor Day proved to be less deadly than the Fourth of July this year, in which nine people were killed over the five-day holiday.

“The numbers are within the normal fluctuations we typically see from year to year,” said Ryan Tarkowski, a Pennsylvania State Police spokesman.

Tarkowski added, “The message really remains the same: Drive sober, buckle up and never drive distracted.”

Categories: Local | Regional | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.