Lt. Gov. John Fetterman expects to move forward after Senate dispute |
Politics Election

Lt. Gov. John Fetterman expects to move forward after Senate dispute

Jamie Martines
The Pennsylvania Capitol in Harrisburg.

Lt. Gov. John Fetterman said he isn’t harboring any ill will over the chaotic scene that unfolded Wednesday while he was presiding over the state Senate.

“I don’t take any of this personally,” he told the Tribune-Review on Thursday ahead of an expected vote on the state budget.

Shouting, name-calling and a brief walkout from Senate Democrats ensued Wednesday over a bill to end the general assistance program, which offers $200 per month to about 10,000 Pennsylvanians who are considered unable to work.

Republicans, who have been pushing to end the decades-old program, accused Democrats of violating Senate rules during a debate over the bill. They singled out Fetterman for leaving his post at the head of the floor, where he presides over the chamber, to speak with feuding lawmakers.

“When the Lt. Governor chose to leave the rostrum this afternoon, it was crucial for me to fulfill my Constitutional role to preside over the Senate,” Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson County, said in a tweet Wednesday.

The president pro tempore presides over the Senate when the lieutenant governor is not present.

Fetterman said he was attempting to deescalate the situation and to put senators at ease when he left the rostrum.

“This whole episode was unnecessary, and it just didn’t have to happen that way,” he said.

The Republican-controlled chamber ultimately voted 26-24 to pass a bill to eliminate the program, with two Republicans voting with Democrats to save it.

The bill now goes to Gov. Tom Wolf, who has not said whether we would sign or veto it.

Fetterman said he has not talked with Scarnati or others involved in the dispute Wednesday, but does not expect the incident to hold up the budget vote.

A statement from Scarnati and Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman described the scene as a “sad day for good government in Pennsylvania.”

“Senate Republicans remain committed to passing a budget and advancing other measures for the benefit of all Pennsylvanians in accordance with the rules of the Senate, and without the displays of partisanship and disrespect that we saw today,” the statement said.

When asked for further comment Thursday, a Senate Republican spokeswoman referred to the statement.

“We are moving forward with the budget and governing,” said Jennifer Kocher, who also works as Corman’s communications director.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.