Bill would dedicate lieutenant governor’s mansion for veterans program, Guard families |

Bill would dedicate lieutenant governor’s mansion for veterans program, Guard families

Jamie Martines
Lt. Gov. John Fetterman.

Pennsylvania Lt. Gov. John Fetterman described a proposal to transfer control of the lieutenant governor’s Fort Indiantown Gap residence to the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs as a “win across the board.”

State senators voted unanimously Wednesday to pass the bill, which would require that the property be used to support veterans’ programs and National Guard families.

The bill was sponsored by Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, a Republican from Jefferson County. It now goes to the House.

Fetterman, a Democrat who served as Braddock’s mayor for 12 years, said he made his views known as the bill was being crafted.

“We led the conversation,” said Fetterman. “I said it has to be for the highest best use of the commonwealth. That would never be as a home for myself and my family.”

Fetterman never moved into the 2,400-square-foot residence on National Guard property, opting instead to rent an apartment in the state capital of Harrisburg. The lieutenant governor’s residence is located about 25 miles northeast of Harrisburg.

Fetterman opened the residence’s pool for use by area children in June. His wife, Gisele Fetterman, ran a program to teach water safety.

Those programs are expected to continue if the bill passes, Fetterman said.

The Associated Press contributed.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.