Mercer County among first in state to implement new post-election audits |

Mercer County among first in state to implement new post-election audits

Paul Guggenheimer

A Western Pennsylvania county will be among the first in the state to have an enhanced audit of its election results.

Mercer and Philadelphia counties both bought new voting systems that will be used for the first time in November.

With concerns over election security increasing in recent years, the new voting systems purchased in recent weeks will use mathematically proven sampling to verify election results.

“Mercer County is honored to have been asked by the Department of State to be on the ground floor of what is expected to be the future of post-election audits in Pennsylvania,” said Director of Elections Jeff Greenburg. “While we are certainly aware there are many hurdles to overcome before this is implemented statewide, we recognize how important this can be to strengthen our voters’ trust and faith in elections.”

Earlier this month, the Mercer County Board of Elections approved the use of paper ballots with Election System & Software DS200 optical scanners, along with ES&S Express Vote accessible ballot-marking devices.

Last April, the Department of State informed counties that they must select new voting systems that provide a paper record and meet higher standards of security, auditability and accessibility no later than December 31 2019, and must implement those systems no later than the 2020 primary election.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.