Owners of banned fraternity house sue Penn State | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Owners of banned fraternity house sue Penn State

Deb Erdley
1334819_web1_PSUfrathouse

More than two years after the February 2017 death of Timothy Piazza, a Penn State student who died of injuries he sustained during an alcohol-fueled fraternity pledge event, the lawsuits just keep coming.

The Associated Press is reporting the fraternity corporation that owns the shuttered Beta Theta Pi fraternity house is suing the university.

The suit claims Penn State banned the organization in order to obtain the sprawling house that sits on choice real estate in the middle of the campus. The report said the suit, filed last week in federal court, charged that the university failed to follow proper guidelines in banning the fraternity and made it a scapegoat for a campus culture of drinking and partying.

The lawsuit is just the latest development in the high-profile case that garnered national headlines.

Piazza’s parents Jim and Evelyn Piazza, who took up a national crusade against such events following the young man’s death, settled with Penn State out of court earlier this year. They later filed wrongful death suits against members of the now-defunct fraternity.

Multiple members of the fraternity were charged criminally in connection with the event that led to Piazza’s death.

Many opted to enter guilty pleas to reduced charges of alcohol violations or hazing.

Last month, the manager of the fraternity house was convicted of hindering apprehension, but acquitted of tampering with evidence and obstruction of justice, following a criminal trial. Authorities alleged Braxton Becker deleted security camera footage of the event that led to Piazza’s death.

Penn State moved to adopt new guidelines for Greek life in the wake of Piazza’s death, as the state passed a stricter anti-hazing law.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.