Pa. adds Tree-of-Heaven to noxious weeds list, bans sales to combat spotted lanternfly |

Pa. adds Tree-of-Heaven to noxious weeds list, bans sales to combat spotted lanternfly

Patrick Varine
Penn State Extension
Spotted Lanternfly swarm a Tree-of-Heaven, a rapidly growing tree native to China and Taiwan that was introduced into the United States more than 200 years ago. The lanternfly, which can do serious harm to agricultural crops, are particularly attracted to the invasive plant.
Penn State Extension
A magnified photo shows Tree-of-Heaven leaves, which are similar to native sumac, but have several important differences.

Members of the Pennsylvania Noxious Weeds Committee are hoping that adding a new species to its list will help address another invasive issue: the spotted lanternfly.

The committee has added Tree-of-Heaven to the state’s Class B noxious weeds list.

“Class B includes species that are so widespread, it would be prohibitively difficult to order their removal,” said state Department of Agriculture Press Secretary Shannon Powers. “It will, however, ban future sales of trees or seeds in Pennsylvania.”

The native Asian tree is a favorite of the spotted lanternfly. Also from Asia, the insect was first discovered in Pennsylvania in Berks County in 2014 and eventually in a dozen other counties in the southeast portion of the state. The invasive pest has shown a preference for feeding on Tree-of-Heaven plants in order to reproduce, according to Powers.

Tree-of-Heaven was first introduced into the United States in the Philadelphia area in 1784, according to the Penn State Extention. It is native to northeast and central China. It is very similar in appearance to native smooth sumac, however smooth sumac leaves are serrated along the edges. Tree-of-Heaven leaves are smooth, and have two small “glandular teeth,” or nodules, at the base of the leaf.

Tree-of-Heaven also has a distinctively bad smell when its leaves are crushed.

It was initially valued as an urban street tree and was widely planted in the Baltimore and Washington, D.C., area. From these areas, Tree-of-Heaven has spread and become a common invasive plant in urban, agricultural and forested areas.

About a year ago, the noxious weeds committee met with a similar purpose, and one of the items up for discussion was Japanese barberry, a haven for ticks. Pennsylvania has one of the highest rates in the nation of Lyme disease infection. In 2017, there were more than 11,000 cases reported, according to the Center for Disease Control, which ranked Pennsylvania and New Jersey as the two worst states in the U.S. for Lyme disease risk.

The committee has not added Japanese barberry to the noxious weeds list.

Its members did, however, add European frogbit, European water chestnut and water primrose to the Class A list. They also voted to keep hydrilla on the list.

The committee’s changes will go info effect on July 31.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.