Pa. bill limiting gifts to public officials moves in Legislature | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Pa. bill limiting gifts to public officials moves in Legislature

Associated Press
1962968_web1_1962968-f2cf0f367c6c41959183d860920fbcc2
AP
Chairman Garth Everett, R-Lycoming, center, speaks during a House State Government Committee hearing on new limits for public officials taking gifts at the Pennsylvania Capitol in Harrisburg on Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2019.

HARRISBURG — A legislative committee voted Tuesday to advance new limits on gifts to Pennsylvania public officials, including an outright prohibition on taking cash, although the proposal includes numerous exceptions.

The House State Government Committee unanimously approved an annual limit on the cash value of gifts and hospitality that public officials, public employees or candidates can accept.

The vote came after Republicans pushed through a party-line vote to add an exception to let lobbyists give birthday or wedding presents.

Rep. Matt Gabler, R-Clearfield, said he wanted to make the legislation “more workable” and argued that lobbyists have friends and attend personal events such as weddings where gifts should be allowed.

He said his exception is “allowing for regular human interaction when there is a significant life event.”

Gifts generally would not be allowed if they total more than $50 from one person in a calendar year, or hospitality, transportation or lodging worth $500 a year.

The bill’s other exceptions would permit gifts from family members or “gifts exchanged between public officials or public employees on a voluntary basis.” Lobbyist gifts would not be covered if the lobbyist and public official have “a personal romantic relationship.”

Other exceptions include informational material, awards, prizes, training in the government’s interest, food and drinks at public meetings and educational missions.

Rep. Jared Solomon, D-Philadelphia, said a tougher policy on gifts might help lawmakers improve their historically miserable public approval ratings.

Committee Chairman Garth Everett, R-Lycoming, said afterward the total ban on cash gifts is a central element of the proposal, and acknowledged the legislation is not a gift ban.

“There ought to be some middle ground in order for us to conduct business, as long as things are open and transparent and that taxpayers know what we’re accepting and from who,” Everett said.

Rep. Vanessa Lowery Brown, D-Philadelphia, was sentenced in 2018 to probation on a bribery conviction in a case that included acceptance of unreported cash gifts. Her investigation led both state legislative chambers in 2014 to ban most types of cash gifts to members.

Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf has banned gifts to executive branch employees under his authority and has repeatedly pushed the Republican-controlled Legislature to do the same. Republican lawmakers were critical of the Wolf policy during the Tuesday hearing, noting that his staff have turned down bottles of water and paid their own way or declined food at public events.

Most other states have laws limiting the extent of gifts that lawmakers may accept, but in Pennsylvania, lobbyists and other groups routinely provide lawmakers free meals, travel and tickets to expensive sporting or entertainment events to lawmakers.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.