Pa. budget brinksmanship leaves last-minute bills in doubt |

Pa. budget brinksmanship leaves last-minute bills in doubt

Associated Press
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
The Pennsylvania Capitol in Harrisburg.

HARRISBURG — Republicans who control the Pennsylvania Legislature are inserting some pet policy objectives into hundreds of pages of just-unveiled legislation with the annual budget deadline days away, forcing Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf to make hard choices.

Amid the deadline brinksmanship, measures expected to advance Thursday included a $34 billion budget package and changes to laws that govern elections, public schools and human services.

One GOP-backed provision could make Wolf decide between eliminating a decades-old cash assistance program for the poor and continuing state subsidies for Philadelphia hospitals. Another provision inserted into a sprawling budget-related bill would stall any move by Philadelphia to ban plastic bags or impose a fee on reusable bags that many stores provide.

Wolf in 2017 vetoed a bill that sought to prevent counties and municipalities from taxing or banning plastic bags.

Late Wednesday, Republicans inserted a provision to authorize up to $90 million in state aid to help counties buy new voting machines into legislation that makes changes to election laws.

One of those changes includes ending a ballot option that allows voters to simply select a straight-party ticket in elections. It comes as Republicans worry that waves of moderate suburban voters inflamed by President Donald Trump could also punish down-ballot Republican candidates in the 2020 election.

Wolf hasn’t said how he’ll handle bills that include provisions hotly opposed by his Democratic allies in the Legislature.

Some Democrats say they worry that ending straight-ticket voting options will benefit Republicans in down-ballot legislative elections. The House’s Democratic whip, Rep. Jordan Harris of Philadelphia, said he is concerned that it will diminish the influence of voters in his district.

“There are many studies that show that it disenfranchises poor, minority voters,” Harris said in an interview. “Also, voters from densely populated areas, and as you know, as a Philadelphian, that’s my community.”

Republicans contend it will make elections fairer for people of all political parties.

Rep. Marcy Toepel, R-Montgomery, said eliminating straight ticket voting would require voters to become more informed about the candidates.

“I think it forces voters to become educated about who they’re voting for,” Toepel said.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.