ShareThis Page
Pa. lawmakers try to stop plan to switch paratransit funding from counties to private brokers |

Pa. lawmakers try to stop plan to switch paratransit funding from counties to private brokers

Rich Cholodofsky

State lawmakers Tuesday moved to delay — and eventually kill, they hope — a planned funding change that could severely reduce subsidized rides to doctors offices and other medical appointments for the poor and elderly in Pennsylvania.

Two pending bills, one each in the Senate and House, would postpone a program authorized last year to give oversight of the state’s medical assistance transportation program to private brokers to dole out state and federal money to vendors that operate local services.

“This is the biggest change in more than 20 years, and we should have a hearing on it first,” said state Rep. Eric Nelson, R-Hempfield. He is one of more than 50 co-sponsors of the proposed legislation to delay the change.

Money for medical assistance transportation now is dispersed to counties to administer and pay for programs that offer subsidized rides to low-income residents for medical purposes. Such a program accounts for more than half of nearly 200,000 trips taken last year by Go Westmoreland, the county’s shared-ride paratransit program.

Westmoreland County Transit Authority administers the local paratransit program. Alan Blahovec, executive director of the authority, said the funding change could potentially remove the county agency as the local provider, leaving the agency without enough money to operate the remaining shared-ride programs at their current levels.

Go Westmoreland provides door-to-door transportation to residents as part of a number of social service programs for low income, elderly and disabled residents.

“If we don’t have the medical assistance transportation program, it will create lots of problems. The entire (paratransit) program will either have to be cut back or fares will have to be raised,” Blahovec said.

Medical assistance funding represents nearly two-thirds of the authority’s $5.5 million paratransit budget, officials said.

State lawmakers actually voted to implement the change as part of last summer’s budget vote when the broker system for medical assistance transportation funding was enacted.

Nelson said the program was inserted at the 11th hour and lawmakers did not understand the implications of the vote.

The pending legislation in both the House and Senate would delay implementation until lawmakers get a better understanding of its impact on local paratransit systems.

“It’s been an extremely organic resistance movement to seek a delay. We need an opportunity to fully vet this concept,” Nelson said.

Officials said the state Department of Human Services has solicited proposals from private brokers and could start awarding contracts this summer.

“Once those contracts are awarded, there’s no going back,” Nelson said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.