Penn State police K-9 handler placed on leave after report of animal abuse |

Penn State police K-9 handler placed on leave after report of animal abuse

Penn State University Police and Public Safety/Facebook

A Penn State police officer was placed on administrative leave in July after the department received a report of possible animal abuse by one of its K-9 handlers, a university official said Monday.

The department immediately referred the report to state police, which is investigating the report, university police public information officer Jenn Cruden wrote in an email on behalf of the department Monday. The dog has since been boarded, she said.

The university declined to release the officer’s name because the investigation is ongoing and no charges have been filed. State police trooper and public information officer Joseph Dunsmore on Tuesday confirmed the department has been investigating the report, but declined to comment further.

Penn State Police Officers’ Association President Josh Quimby, who is also one of the university’s three K-9 handlers, declined to comment Tuesday.

The K-9 unit was established in the 1990s and provides security services at university infrastructure throughout the state. The unit responds to more than 30 emergency calls for service annually, ranging from investigating bomb threats at schools and businesses to providing security at large scale venues.

University police Lt. Matt White, who supervises the university’s K-9 unit, said Cruden’s statement was made on his behalf and declined to comment further.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.