Pennsylvania among top third of states in taxpayer accuracy |

Pennsylvania among top third of states in taxpayer accuracy

Jeff Himler
Bloomberg photo by Andrew Harrer
The word “taxes” is seen on the facade of the Internal Revenue Service headquarters in Washington.

A little under 6 percent of Pennsylvania taxpayers are spot-on when it comes to figuring their federal income tax. That is, when they file their returns with the IRS, they’re neither due a refund nor required to submit a payment.

That’s not a very big percentage, but it’s enough to place Pennsylvania among the top third of states when ranked according to the accuracy of its taxpayers — in a study released this month by SmartAsset, a company that provides online advice on personal finances.

Based on 2016 IRS data, the study found that Pennsylvania ranked 13th for taxpayer accuracy among the 50 states and Washington, D.C.

Of nearly 6.2 million federal tax returns filed in the state, 78 percent included an over-payment that required a refund while, in just under 16 percent of the returns, the IRS was owed money. The zero-balance sweet spot occurred in 5.93 percent of returns.

Many people look forward to — or event count on — receiving a tax refund from the IRS. The odds are in their favor, as the study found that an average of 75 percent of American taxpayers have too much of their earnings withheld for the IRS. About 19 percent underpay their taxes.

According to the study, Montana taxpayers are the most accurate, with 7.78 percent of their returns perfectly balanced.

Mississippi was at the bottom of the rankings, with 3.57 percent of returns meeting the accuracy standard.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.