Pennsylvania court collections, disbursements rise by nearly $30 million over last decade |

Pennsylvania court collections, disbursements rise by nearly $30 million over last decade

Jeff Himler

Pennsylvania’s courts increased their annual disbursements of collected fees, fines and restitution by more than $29 million over the past decade, a trend explained in part by use of case management computer systems, state judicial officials say.

According to the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, those disbursements jumped from $453.8 million in 2009 to about $483.4 million in 2018.

Of last year’s disbursements, the state received $239.2 million, counties split $158.4 million and municipalities shared $42.6 million. Another $39.3 million in restitution was paid to crime victims, while entities such as airports, parking authorities and libraries collectively received $3.9 million.

Regionally, about $128.7 million in collected court funds were disbursed in Westmoreland County from 2009-18, $372.9 million in Allegheny County and $21.8 million in Armstrong County, according to court records.

Officials say computer systems have improved court fee and fine collections — helping to coordinate with the state Department of Revenue, to intercept tax refunds and lottery winnings in order to recoup court-ordered obligations.

Information also is shared with PennDOT, to suspend the driver’s licenses of defendants who fail to pay court costs related to traffic violations, and with an outside collection agency used by 44 Pennsylvania counties.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.