Pa. GOP chair Val DiGiorgio resigns after report of sexually explicit messages |

Pa. GOP chair Val DiGiorgio resigns after report of sexually explicit messages

Associated Press
Val DiGiorgio, chairman of the Pennsylvania Republican Party, announced he is stepping down Tuesday, June 25, 2019, following a published report that he had traded sexually charged text messages with a Philadelphia City Council candidate and also sent her an explicit photo of himself.

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania’s Republican Party chairman stepped down Tuesday as a result of a published report that he had traded sexually charged text messages with a Philadelphia City Council candidate and also sent her an explicit photo.

Val DiGiorgio’s resignation was announced by the state Republican Party.

In a letter to top party officials, DiGiorgio, 51, said the report by The Philadelphia Inquirer contains “gross mischaracterizations” of what he said were “mutual consensual communications.”

“My resignation should be in no way confused as confirmation of these mischaracterizations. I intend to rigorously defend myself against these assertions and protect my family, my colleagues, and the party from this private matter,” DiGiorgio wrote. “I extend my deepest apologies to my family and colleagues for this unfortunate distraction.”

Irina Goldstein, 35, first received a Facebook friend request from DiGiorgio, who is married with children, in October after she commented on a group photo that included him, the Inquirer reported.

They began exchanging photos and text messages in a conversation that quickly turned flirtatious and sexually charged on both sides.

DiGiorgio repeatedly commented on her looks.

“Well you also happen to be nice to look at,” DiGiorgio wrote.

DiGiorgio also turned down her offer to connect through another social media site, writing, “Your too beautiful for me to follow everywhere.”

The Inquirer said they stopped communicating in February after she told him his messages had amounted to him “sexually harassing” her. The Inquirer said it reviewed more than 150 pages of messages, provided by Goldstein, including original messages on her cellphone.

At one point, Goldstein mentioned an aggressive sexual act and requested that DiGiorgio send her an explicit photo, the newspaper said.

DiGiorgio sent a photo, which Goldstein said she saved because she “didn’t really feel safe with this man” and that their interactions put her “in a weird predicament.”

They never had physical contact and she broke off their flirtation soon after he sent the photo, saying, “I prefer to do the fair and right thing.”

“I got it,” DiGiorgio replied. “Was having the same thought.”

Rumors about their interactions began to circulate, prompting a complaint from DiGiorgio in February, the Inquirer reported.

“Anyway, people increasingly are telling me that you, or a friend of yours, have been talking about communications between you and me. So that’s a problem too,” he messaged her on Facebook. “And the problem is, some of these people talking about this are not my friends.”

She continued seeking his help with her campaign, but DiGiorgio said he could not get involved in primaries.

Goldstein, in a Feb. 26 message, responded that his generosity amounted to him “sexually harassing” her and that she had been “afraid of retaliation and rightly so apparently.”

Asked by The Inquirer about her claim of retaliation, Goldstein said she had felt harassed by calls from people asking who she had told about her communication with DiGiorgio.

In a reply to her, DiGiorgio denied any improper behavior.

Joel Frank, general counsel for the state Republican Party and a lawyer for DiGiorgio, called Goldstein’s claims “a mischaracterization, incomplete and defamatory” in a letter last week.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.