ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania government watchdog to probe teen’s murder | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania government watchdog to probe teen’s murder

Associated Press
1039540_web1_1039540-9ee2d538dd2b4e6181a65c6029fd9680
This combination of undated file photos provided Friday, March 29, 2019, by the Bucks County District Attorney’s Office shows Sara Packer, left, and Jacob Sullivan. The Office of State Inspector General said Wednesday, April 17, 2019, it will look into whether the Department of Human Services acted properly in its handling of the case of the 2016 rape, torture and murder of 14-year-old Grace Packer, who had extensive contact with the child welfare system. Sara Packer, Grace Packer’s adoptive mother, pleaded guilty to first-degree murder and was sentenced to life without parole for plotting her brutal death, while her boyfriend, Sullivan, who raped and strangled Grace while her mother watched, has been sentenced to death. (Bucks County District Attorney’s Office via AP)

A Pennsylvania state government watchdog agency has launched an investigation into the horrific case of a 14-year-old girl who had extensive contact with the child welfare system before her 2016 rape, torture and murder, a lawmaker who requested the review announced Wednesday.

The Office of State Inspector General has agreed to look into whether the Department of Human Services acted properly in its handling of the Grace Packer case.

“It is obvious to anyone inside or outside government that she was failed by the system,” said state Rep. Rob Kauffman, R-Franklin, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. “She was horrifically abused and then failed by the system every time something was brought to light. And we have got to get some answers.”

Grace endured years of sexual, physical and emotional abuse before her death in a sweltering attic outside Philadelphia. An internal DHS probe has already found that county child welfare agencies had ample cause to remove her from the home but failed to do so.

The teenager’s adoptive mother, Sara Packer, pleaded guilty to first-degree murder and was sentenced last month to life without parole for plotting her brutal death. A jury gave the death penalty to Sara Packer’s boyfriend, Jacob Sullivan, who raped and strangled Grace while her mother watched. He had also pleaded guilty to first-degree murder and other charges. Sullivan and Sara Packer kept Grace’s remains in cat litter for several months before dismembering the body and dumping it in a wooded area.

Kauffman and state Rep. Karen Boback, R-Luzerne, chairwoman of the Children and Youth Committee, noted in a letter to Inspector General Bruce Beemer that DHS has oversight responsiblity for county child welfare agencies. DHS is also supposed to investigate abuse allegations itself when the suspected perpetrator works for a county agency. Sara Packer was a former adoptions supervisor with Northampton County’s children and youth agency.

“It’s a matter of high public concern and urgency,” said Clarke Madden, Beemer’s spokesman. “We’re going to put a lot of resources into it.”

Beemer said in a response to Kauffman and Boback that the review could help the human services department “improve their operations.”

DHS spokeswoman Ali Fogarty said the agency welcomes the investigation.

“Nothing is more integral to our mission than protecting children. We work closely with the inspector general and we welcome any effort to build upon the recommendations included in the state’s report,” she said.

Legislation introduced separately in the House last week would create a 17-member commission tasked with improving the state’s child welfare system.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.