Pennsylvania National Guard family college benefit touted |

Pennsylvania National Guard family college benefit touted

Deb Erdley

Pennsylvania’s Adjutant General on Friday urged state lawmakers to endorse a family education benefit for members of the state’s National Guard touted as the first of its kind n the nation.

Gov. Tom Wolf endorsed the concept of the Military Family Education Program or PA GI Bill, which has snared bi-partisan support in the House and Senate, in his 2020 budget proposal.

In letters to members of the Legislature, Maj. Gen. Tony Carrelli, adjutant general and head of the Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, said the benefit, with an estimated price tag of $2.5 million a year, would be the first of its kind in the nation to allow eligible guard members to transfer their state education benefits to a spouse or child.

Carrelli touted the program as a re-enlistment benefit designed to aid families while improving the Guard’s retention rates

The state’s existing program provides Pennsylvania National Guard members with a non-transferable education benefit after six years of service. The new proposal would allow members to transfer that benefit, which covers 10 semesters of tuition capped at State System of Higher Education rates, to a family member after completing an initial six-year term and committing to a second six years of service.

“We hope that Pennsylvania lawmakers enact this legislation to support our families who serve and sacrifice right alongside our members in the National Guard,” said Carrelli, in a statement released Friday. “This strong, far-reaching benefit will help secure our families’ educational future and also greatly increase our retention which has eroded during many years of increased service across the Commonwealth and around the world.”

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.