ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania opens investigation into gas liquids pipeline | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania opens investigation into gas liquids pipeline

Associated Press
872020_web1_GTR-shapiro1-SH-092818
Tribune-Review
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro discusses topics with the Trib Total Media Editorial Board on Thursday, Sept. 27, 2018 at the newspaper offices in Greensburg.

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania’s attorney general said Tuesday that his office has opened an investigation into construction on a 350-mile natural gas liquids pipeline project across southern Pennsylvania that has been blamed for polluting waterways in dozens of places and causing sinkholes near homes.

Attorney General Josh Shapiro took the investigation on a referral from Delaware County’s district attorney, which said it will work with the state to investigate the Mariner East 1, 2 and 2x pipeline projects.

Shapiro’s office received the referral around March 1. A spokesman declined to say more about the investigation, including what prompted it.

“We will leave no stone unturned in this case,” Shapiro said in a brief statement.

The Mariner East pipelines run alongside each other and are owned by Texas-based Energy Transfer LP, a multibillion-dollar firm that owns sprawling interests in oil and gas pipelines and storage and processing facilities.

The company’s projects have drawn more than $13 million in fines in Pennsylvania — primarily for polluting waterways from spills of drilling fluid and construction methods not approved by state regulators — and several temporary shutdown orders by state agencies.

Sinkholes on the lawns of homes in Chester County have highlighted the lack of state authority to regulate the routes and safety features of intrastate pipelines, and prompted the county’s district attorney to start a criminal investigation.

The pipelines are the subject of various lawsuits and challenges in front of state regulators. At one point, the state Department of Environmental Protection accused an Energy Transfer subsidiary of “egregious and willful violations” of state law.

Last month, Gov. Tom Wolf criticized the company, saying “there has been a failure by Energy Transfer and its subsidiaries to respect our laws and our communities.”

Energy Transfer said Tuesday there is no legitimate basis for a criminal investigation.

It said it is confident that it hasn’t violated any criminal laws and intends to defend itself. It also said it has worked closely with state officials and inspectors, and hopes to speak to prosecutors’ offices to bring the matter “to an appropriate resolution.”

“The safety of all those who live and work along our pipeline is our first priority, and this project was planned and implemented based on that fact,” the company said.

Energy Transfer reported $54.1 billion in revenue in 2018, with net income of $3.4 billion.

Its $2.5 billion, 20-inch Mariner East 2 pipeline began operating in late December, ferrying propane, butane and ethane from Marcellus Shale natural gas drilling fields in southwestern Pennsylvania to its export terminal near Philadelphia, the Marcus Hook Industrial Complex.

The 16-inch Mariner East 2X is almost complete.

A January shutdown of Mariner East 1 — a nearly 90-year-old oil pipeline recently overhauled to carry natural gas liquids — is still in effect after another sinkhole opened alongside it in Chester County.

A February order halting construction permits for Energy Transfer pipelines also is still in effect after state officials accused the company of failing for months to fix erosions problems blamed for an explosion on a methane pipeline that destroyed a home in western Pennsylvania.

While Energy Transfer has denied criminal wrongdoing, the chief executive and chairman of its general partner, Kelcy Warren, told analysts in a conference call last month that the company had made mistakes in Pennsylvania.

“We’re going to take our medicine and fix those mistakes and complete good projects from this point forward, not to insinuate that everything we’ve done has been bad,” Warren said. “It’s just we’ve made some mistakes that we’re not proud of. So you’ll see that improve, and when we don’t make those mistakes again that our costs are going to improve and the predictability of those costs are likewise going to improve.”

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.