Pennsylvania’s absentee ballot rules mean many arrive too late to be counted |

Pennsylvania’s absentee ballot rules mean many arrive too late to be counted

Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA — Comparatively tight deadlines for absentee ballots mean Pennsylvania’s mail-in votes arrive too late to be counted far more often than the national average, a newspaper reported Friday.

The Philadelphia Inquirer reported that 4.2% of the state’s absentee ballots got to voting offices after the deadline to be counted in the November 2018 election, compared with less than 1% nationally.

The newspaper cites data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission that ranks Pennsylvania second in the rate of missed-deadline rejections, behind only Delaware.

Pennsylvania’s voters submitted 187,000 absentee ballots in last year’s general election and 8,700 were rejected, the great majority for missing a deadline.

Absentee ballots can be rejected for reasons that include missing signatures or invalid envelopes. Nationally, just over a quarter of rejected absentee ballots are for missed deadlines.

The Inquirer said the self-reported commission figures apparently undercounted the number of Pennsylvania’s late ballots by at least 1,400. Bucks County had hundreds of late ballots, but the recommission reported it as having none, as was the case for Allegheny County.

Philadelphia had more than 1,000 late ballots, but was listed as having 378. Counts for other Pennsylvania counties appeared to be accurate.

Pennsylvania voters cast just 0.6% of the total absentee ballots submitted nationwide last fall, but the state accounted for 7.2% of all late absentee ballots.

The figures concern civilian voters in the United States. There is a different process for overseas civilian and active-duty military voters.

Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf supports “no-excuse” absentee voting, an extension of in-person delivery of absentee ballots by three days and a week longer for the mail-in deadline.

Wolf this month vetoed a bill that would have loosened absentee voting deadlines. The bill carried $90 million to help counties buy new voting machines before the 2020 presidential election, but it also would have eliminated the straight-party ticket voting option on ballots, which Wolf said would lead to voter confusion and longer lines, while other Democrats argued it would have helped down-ballot Republican candidates.

Pennsylvania voters have until a week before an election to request an absentee ballot, which is mailed to them. A filled-out ballot must be returned by mail or in person by 5 p.m. on the Friday before an election.

That means voters have just three days between the application and submission deadlines. If mail takes two days to travel from elections officials to the voter, and then two days to travel back, the ballot arrives after the deadline and is rejected.

Election officials say that problem has been exacerbated by recent changes to postal delivery.

The ACLU of Pennsylvania sued the state last year with a group of voters who wanted to vote absentee in November, but their ballots arrived after the deadline. The plaintiffs argue the deadlines violate the state constitution’s guarantee of “free and equal” elections and equal protection rights. A panel of judges is deciding whether to let that case proceed.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.