Philadelphia officials declare health emergency over Hepatitis A outbreak |

Philadelphia officials declare health emergency over Hepatitis A outbreak

Drug use and homelessness are two main reasons why hepatitis A infections have increased nearly 300% in the United States since 2015, says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Philadelphia health officials have declared an emergency over an outbreak of Hepatitis A in the city that has affected 154 people since January, and are calling for health providers to increase vaccinations to combat the liver disease.

Hepatitis A is caused by a virus that spreads through oral contact with infected feces — usually after a person has consumed contaminated food or water. Typically, the city sees about two to six cases a year.

But cases of the disease began to increase this year, and accelerated this spring, with more than 130 people contracting Hepatitis A since May alone.

Most of the city’s Hepatitis A cases this year — 67% — have occurred among people who use drugs, who are typically at high risk for the disease, the health department wrote in its emergency declaration. Of those cases, 26% occurred among people experiencing homelessness, another high-risk population. Other populations at risk include men who have sex with men and people currently or recently jailed.

Many cases occurred in Kensington, the epicenter of the city’s opioid epidemic, which has a high concentration of homeless people in addiction.

Silvana Mazzella, the associate executive director of Prevention Point, a Kensington-based public health organization for people in addiction, said that in the spring, staffers began to notice that more clients were falling ill. Symptoms of Hepatitis A can include vomiting, jaundice and abdominal pain. While most cases resolve without treatment, the infection can be dangerous for seniors and those who are medically fragile or already have liver disease.

“The unfortunate thing is that when you’re unsheltered, and living outside or in encampments, people do get sick, and it spreads,” Mazzella said. “Any time you have people living communally and don’t have access to public bathrooms — essentially, places to defecate, or to wash hands — you’re going to get an increase in infection.”

Stephen Gluckman, medical director at Penn Global Medicine and an expert in infectious disease, said mass immunization is key to combating the outbreak.

“The solution is to immunize — and there’s an extremely effective vaccine that’s close to 100% effective,” he said. “The other solution is to try to improve the general hygiene in the area — by making sure there are enough clean places for people to defecate, and having access to things to clean your hands, something as simple as alcohol hand sanitizer.”

By June, Mazzella said, the city was vaccinating hundreds of people in Kensington alone; many clients at Prevention Point were concerned about getting sick, and eager to get vaccinated, she said. The city is also installing public restrooms and hand-washing stations in the neighborhood.

Tom Farley, the city health commissioner, said it’s not clear why the outbreak began this year when hundreds of people have been living rough in Kensington for some time.

In May, Pennsylvania declared a hepatitis A outbreak after identifying 171 cases around the state, with 40 of them in Philadelphia. (Other states around the country have dealt with much larger outbreaks; more than 2,000 cases have been reported in Ohio and West Virginia.)

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.