Philadelphia transit police strike over working conditions |

Philadelphia transit police strike over working conditions

Associated Press
Associated Press
Philadelphia transit system police officers picket Wednesday outside the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority headquarters in Philadelphia.

PHILADELPHIA — Police officers for the Philadelphia region’s main transit system went on strike Wednesday, citing poor working conditions for the 178 officers that patrol stations.

Members of the Fraternal Order of Transit Police Lodge 109 walked off the job for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority when they said a contract presented to them “wasn’t what they told us it was going to be.”

“It’s extremely frustrating,” said Troy Parham, vice president of the union, as he and others picketed outside SEPTA’s headquarters in downtown Philadelphia. “They (SEPTA) let us believe we were almost there. At the last minute, we have to call this strike. It’s unfortunate.”

SEPTA said it does not expect the strike to affect services for the nation’s sixth-largest transportation system in terms of ridership, operating buses, subways, trolleys and trains.

The police union has been seeking a new contract to replace an agreement that expired a year ago. SEPTA said the average police officer salary is $78,706 a year.

SEPTA spokesman Andrew Busch said their strike contingency plan calls for police supervisors to work 12-hour shifts and an increased presence by city and suburban police.

Union President Omari Bervine told TV station WTXF that the union is underpaid and understaffed and that members “need to be compensated fairly.”

SEPTA and the union don’t have immediate plans to meet again, Parham said, but he’s “hoping we can resolve this soon.”

“It’s not fair to my members, it’s not fair to this union, it’s not fair to the riders on SEPTA,” he said. “It’s something we can get resolved in a few minutes.”

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.