Police: Deaths of 4 believed homicide-suicide in Bradford County | TribLIVE.com

Police: Deaths of 4 believed homicide-suicide in Bradford County

Associated Press

WYALUSING — Four people were found dead in a northern Pennsylvania home in what is believed to have been a murder-suicide, state police said.

Police in Bradford County said the bodies were found Friday in a home in Wyalusing. Jesse Lee Northrup is believed to have shot and killed Edwin Bidlack, Candy Diane Bidlack and Johnnie Johnson, whose bodies were found in separate locations in the residence, police said.

Northrup was also found deceased in the residence of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound, they said. Ages of the four weren’t immediately available. The motivation for the crime “is part of an ongoing investigation,” police said.

Neighbors said Edwin Bidlack owned Ed’s Heating in Wyalusing, and Candy Diane Bidlack was his wife and Johnnie Johnson was his employee. Northrup, they said, was Candy Bidlack’s son.

Donald Pickett, who lives less than two miles away, called the news “tragic” and said the word spread fast in the area of small towns. He said he and his family had known the couple for years, and Ed Bidlack installed furnaces in their homes.

“They are neighbors to my son,” he told WNEP-TV. “They are just great neighbors, good people, and just a huge shock to the community.”

James MacDonald was sitting on his porch trying to absorb the news, calling Ed Bidlack a friend, a neighbor, and “a servant of the whole community.”

MacDonald said he passes through nearly every day and always waved to Bidlack while passing, WBRE-TV reported. He remembered when Bidlack and Johnson fixed a flat tire for him when he had to pick up his special-needs daughter.

“They had me all fixed up. I wasn’t even late,” MacDonald said. “It’s going to be hard to believe that these guys aren’t around.”

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.