Report shows many underage kids get alcohol from parents, friends’ parents |

Report shows many underage kids get alcohol from parents, friends’ parents

Emily Balser
In this Nov. 8, 2018, file photo, cases of beer stacked next to each other in a liquor store.

One in four Pennsylvania kids who drink underage get the alcohol from their parents, according to a report released Thursday by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board.

One in five got the alcohol from a friend’s parent, the report said.

The biennial Report on Underage and High-Risk Drinking details current trends and rates of consumption for underage kids and college students. It surveys students in sixth, eighth, 10th and 12th grades and outlines education and prevention initiatives to address alcohol-related issues.

Armstrong at 56%, Elk at 54% and Lawrence at 52% were the counties with the highest percentage of reported use of alcohol by students. Counties with the lowest percentage of students who reported drinking underage were Snyder at 32%, Lancaster at 35% and Dauphin at 36%.

Other finds in the report show:

• Pennsylvania reported more than a 10% reduction in the number of crashes involving a drinking driver between 16 and 20 years old from the 2015 to 2017.

• More than 80% of Pennsylvania students think their parents would disapprove of them using alcohol.

• Students whose families have clear rules about the use of alcohol drank 40% less than students whose families do not have clear rules on alcohol use.

“What’s clear from the statistics is that parents’ attitudes towards alcohol have a significant impact on children’s decisions to try or not try alcohol,” said PLCB Chairman Tim Holden in a press release.

The full report can be found on the PLCB’s website under 2019 Report on Underage and High-Risk Drinking.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.