Senate sends fight over Pennsylvania’s minimum wage to House |

Senate sends fight over Pennsylvania’s minimum wage to House

Associated Press

HARRISBURG — Legislation to raise Pennsylvania’s minimum wage for the first time since 2009 passed the state Senate on Wednesday against a deadline to stall Gov. Tom Wolf’s move to substantially expand overtime pay eligibility.

The Republican-controlled Senate approved the bill, 42-7, to raise Pennsylvania’s minimum wage in four steps to $9.50 in 2022, although it is a difficult pill to swallow for many Democratic lawmakers who disliked the concessions that Wolf made in a deal with Republicans.

Pennsylvania’s current minimum wage is the federal minimum of $7.25, which lags each of its neighbors and 29 states that have raised their minimum wages. Still, the bill’s prospects in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives are unclear, and top Republicans there have said little about it or steadfastly opposed any increase.

Wolf, a Democrat, has pushed lawmakers for a higher minimum wage since he took office in 2015.

Helping drive the timing of the deal now was the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, which had opposed an increase in the minimum wage.

However, the chamber viewed Wolf’s regulatory package to expand overtime pay eligibility to tens of thousands of salaried workers as far more expensive for businesses, and it backed a compromise on raising the minimum wage to get Wolf to relent on it.

In January, Wolf had backed the goal of putting Pennsylvania’s minimum wage on a path to $15 an hour, as several Democratic-controlled states have done.

“There is no win here,” Sen. Vincent Hughes, D-Philadelphia, said during floor debate. “There is no win, none that we should be celebrating, none that we should be dancing and popping champagne corks, anything like that.”

Democrats, nevertheless, voted in lockstep to get the bill through the chamber, but, Hughes said, “let’s not say that we are the great saviors for low-income working individuals. The fight for $15 does not stop on the passage of this bill. The fight for $15 will continue.”

Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, R-Centre, responded that compromises are tough, but necessary to get a minimum wage bill through the Senate for the first time in 13 years.

“A lot of people think compromises are a four-letter word,” Corman said during floor debate. “It’s not. You know what a four-letter word is? Zero. Zero is a four-letter word. If you don’t compromise, if you don’t come to middle ground, you get zero. … Today we are moving the ball with this compromise.”

In Pennsylvania, the unemployment rate hit a record low this year and payrolls are at a record high. But while Pennsylvania’s median wages grew faster than the national average last year, after being adjusted for inflation, they grew more slowly for workers in the bottom 10th percentile of income, according to an analysis of census data by the labor-affiliated Keystone Research Center.

About 385,000 people in Pennsylvania hold a job that pays between $7.25 an hour and $9.50 an hour, according to the state Department of Labor and Industry.

The bill is far more modest than what Wolf proposed in January, and requires him to make a number of concessions. That includes rescinding his proposed overtime regulation before a state rule-making board votes on it Thursday.

Other concessions made by Wolf include dropping his proposal to eliminate Pennsylvania’s tipped wage minimum, now $2.83, so that the broader minimum wage applies to tipped workers, and boosting the minimum wage annually so it keeps pace with inflation.

Democratic lawmakers also unsuccessfully sought to allow cities to set their own minimum wage higher than the state’s wage.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.