Sorry, Sheetz: Wawa has best bathrooms in Pennsylvania |

Sorry, Sheetz: Wawa has best bathrooms in Pennsylvania

Brian C. Rittmeyer
Convenience store patrons tend to have favorites. Filmmaker Matthew Fridg explores brands and talks with fans for his documentary “Sheetz Vs. Wawa: The Movie.”

Apparently, it’s better in Ohio and West Virginia — or, at least, Sheetz bathrooms are.

Sheetz tops the list for the cleanest bathrooms in those neighboring states, according to gas price tracker GasBuddy.

But Wawa takes the top spot in Pennsylvania.

But Wawa and Sheetz apparently pale in comparison to the lavatories offered by Utah-based Maverik, which claimed the top spot in six states, the most of any brand, and Texas-based Buc-ee’s, which had the highest-rated gas station restrooms in the nation, according to GasBuddy.

According to its ratings and review data, GasBuddy found that gas station restrooms are getting cleaner, with cleanliness ratings improving 6% since 2017.

“The reputation of gas station restrooms has cleaned up significantly in the past three years, with brands making concerted efforts to make their facilities sparkle,” said Frank Beard, convenience store and retail trends analyst at GasBuddy.

Brands needed to have at least 20 locations in a state to be included in the analysis.

Apparently, finding a clean restroom is a rising concern among travelers. GasBuddy’s 2019 summer travel survey found 40% of travelers fear needing to use the restroom but not knowing where to find a clean one, up 3% from the previous year.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.