State bill would add adult sex traffickers, customers to Megan’s Law lists |

State bill would add adult sex traffickers, customers to Megan’s Law lists

Chuck Biedka
State Sen. Kim Ward, R-Hempfield

Sex trafficking is on the rise in Pennsylvania, and state Sen. Kim Ward wants authorities to better keep track of those convicted of the offense.

Ward, R-Hempfield, is proposing a change to state law that would require those convicted of the sex trafficking of adults to be added to the Megan’s List of sex offenders in the state.

“People convicted of trafficking juveniles are added to Megan’s List and those restrictions,” Ward said. “That’s not the case for convictions of people trafficking adults for the sex trade.”

Sex trafficking is defined as profiting by forcing another person to engage in sex acts either through the promise of payment or by the use of threats or violence.

“Its going on, and it’s terrible,” said Ward, who is in her third term.

Polaris, a group that maintains the National Human Trafficking Hotline, reported that Pennsylvania recorded 246 cases involving sexual trafficking in 2018. That was up from 199 cases in 2017; 157 cases in 2016; and 111 cases in 2015.

There were fewer than 100 trafficking cases across the state in 2012, according to Polaris data.

Under Ward’s proposed legislation, traffickers and those who engage in sex acts with people being trafficked would be added to the state’s sexual offenders registry.

People convicted of sex trafficking an adult or patronizing an adult in sexual servitude would be added to the tier I offenders list, who must report their whereabouts and other information annually to state police for 15 years.

Someone convicted of causing the “sexual servitude” of an adult would be added to tier II offenders, who must report twice a year for 25 years.

Ward’s bill is in the Senate Judiciary Committee. The measure has 12 cosponsors — from both political parties — in the Senate.

A Republican caucus spokeswoman on Tuesday said Ward’s bill remains in the Judiciary Committee. Records show the bill was assigned there on Jan. 31.

“A Department of Justice report from 2017 said most sex traffickers repeat crimes and have prior criminal records,” Ward said.

Ward said there appears to be support for the measure.

“I haven’t received any negative feedback,” she said.

A counselor who directs the Alle-Kiski Area HOPE Center likes the bill.

“We have worked with (adult) victims of sexual trafficking in the past year. It’s not uncommon here,” HOPE Center Executive Director Michelle Gibb said, adding she thinks that the law regarding sex trafficking should apply to those who traffic adults as well as children.

“This should be a slam-dunk,” Gibb said.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.